Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;24(7):1237-1246.
doi: 10.1111/ner.13459. Epub 2021 May 19.

Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction Following Spinal Cord Injury: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Review

Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction Following Spinal Cord Injury: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Sam Parittotokkaporn et al. Neuromodulation. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for neurogenic bladder dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury (SCI).

Materials and methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane libraries up to February 2021 was performed using PRISMA methodology. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied TENS for neurogenic bladder in a SCI population were included. The primary outcomes of interest were maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) and maximum detrusor pressure (Pdet). Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan v5.3.

Results: Six RCTs involving 353 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed that TENS significantly increased MCC (standardized mean difference 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-2.14, p = 0.03, I2 = 54%) in acute SCI. No benefits were seen for maximum Pdet. TENS was associated with no major adverse events.

Conclusions: TENS may be an effective, safe intervention for neurogenic bladder dysfunction following SCI. Further studies are essential to confirm these results and more work is required to determine optimal stimulation parameters and duration of the treatment.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; neurogenic bladder; randomized controlled trial; spinal cord injury; transcutaneous electrical stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Manack A, Motsko SP, Haag-Molkenteller C et al. Epidemiology and healthcare utilization of neurogenic bladder patients in a US claims database. Neurourol Urodyn 2011;30:395-401.
    1. Alsulihem A, Corcos J. Evaluation, treatment, and surveillance of neurogenic detrusor overactivity in spinal cord injury patients. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2019;6:1-13.
    1. Kavanagh A, Baverstock R, Campeau L et al. Canadian urological association guideline: diagnosis, management, and surveillance of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction-full text. Can Urol Assoc J 2019;13:E157-E176.
    1. Welk B, Schneider MP, Thavaseelan J, Traini LR, Curt A, Kessler TM. Early urological care of patients with spinal cord injury. World J Urol 2018;36:1537-1544.
    1. Park SE, Elliott S, Noonan VK et al. Impact of bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction on health status of people with thoracolumbar spinal cord injuries living in the community. J Spinal Cord Med 2017;40:548-559.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources