Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul;90(7):1605-1622.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13538. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

A methodological roadmap to quantify animal-vectored spatial ecosystem subsidies

Affiliations
Review

A methodological roadmap to quantify animal-vectored spatial ecosystem subsidies

Diego Ellis-Soto et al. J Anim Ecol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Energy, nutrients and organisms move over landscapes, connecting ecosystems across space and time. Meta-ecosystem theory investigates the emerging properties of local ecosystems coupled spatially by these movements of organisms and matter, by explicitly tracking exchanges of multiple substances across ecosystem borders. To date, meta-ecosystem research has focused mostly on abiotic flows-neglecting biotic nutrient flows. However, recent work has indicated animals act as spatial nutrient vectors when they transport nutrients across landscapes in the form of excreta, egesta and their own bodies. Partly due to its high level of abstraction, there are few empirical tests of meta-ecosystem theory. Furthermore, while animals may be viewed as important mediators of ecosystem functions, better integration of tools is needed to develop predictive insights of their relative roles and impacts on diverse ecosystems. We present a methodological roadmap that explains how to do such integration by discussing how to combine insights from movement, foraging and ecosystem ecology to develop a coherent understanding of animal-vectored nutrient transport on meta-ecosystems processes. We discuss how the slate of newly developed technologies and methods-tracking devices, mechanistic movement models, diet reconstruction techniques and remote sensing-that when integrated have the potential to advance the quantification of animal-vectored nutrient flows and increase the predictive power of meta-ecosystem theory. We demonstrate that by integrating novel and established tools of animal ecology, ecosystem ecology and remote sensing, we can begin to identify and quantify animal-mediated nutrient translocation by large animals. We also provide conceptual examples that show how our proposed integration of methodologies can help investigate ecosystem impacts of large animal movement. We conclude by describing practical advancements to understanding cross-ecosystem contributions of animals on the move. Understanding the mechanisms by which animals shape ecosystem dynamics is important for ongoing conservation, rewilding and restoration initiatives around the world, and for developing more accurate models of ecosystem nutrient budgets. Our roadmap will enable ecologists to better qualify and quantify animal-mediated nutrient translocation for animals on the move.

Keywords: animal movement; biogeochemistry; landscape ecology; meta-ecosystem theory; remote sensing; stoichiometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abbas, F., Merlet, J., Morellet, N., Verheyden, H., Hewison, A. J. M., Cargnelutti, B., Angibault, J. M., Picot, D., Rames, J. L., Lourtet, B., Aulagnier, S., & Daufresne, T. (2012). Roe deer may markedly alter forest nitrogen and phosphorus budgets across Europe. Oikos, 121, 1271-1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20103.x
    1. Allan, B. M., Nimmo, D. G., Ierodiaconou, D., VanDerWal, J., Koh, L. P., & Ritchie, E. G. (2018). Futurecasting ecological research: The rise of technoecology. Ecosphere, 9, e02163. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2163
    1. Allen, C. D., & Wesner, S. J. (2016). Synthesis: Comparing effects of resource and consumer fluxes into recipient food webs using meta- analysis. Ecology, 97, 594-604. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1109.1
    1. Amatulli, G., Domisch, S., Tuanmu, M.-N., Parmentier, B., Ranipeta, A., Malczyk, J., & Jetz, W. (2018). A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling. Scientific Data, 5, 180040. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.40
    1. Anderson, W. B., Wait, D. A., & Stapp, P. (2008). Resources from another place and time: Responses to pulses in a spatially subsidized system. Ecology, 89, 660-670. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0234.1

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources