Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;31(4):498-507.
doi: 10.1111/vec.13064. Epub 2021 May 20.

Comparison of trauma sustained by civilian dogs and deployed military working dogs

Thomas H Edwards  1 , Laura L F Scott  1 , Kerry E Gonyeau  2 , Emily H Howard  3 , Jacquelyn S Parker  4 , Kelly Hall  5
Affiliations

Comparison of trauma sustained by civilian dogs and deployed military working dogs

Thomas H Edwards et al. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the prevalence of types of trauma, mechanisms of injury, and outcomes among military working dogs (MWDs), operational canines (OpK9s), and civilian dogs (CDs) that sustained traumatic injury.

Design: Retrospective descriptive analysis.

Animals: One hundred and ninety-three cases of MWD trauma, 26,099 cases of CD trauma, 35 cases of OpK9 trauma.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Medical records of MWDs that incurred trauma while deployed to the Middle East were identified, and information was extracted from these records. The resultant database was compared to CD and OpK9s in the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care (ACVECC) Veterinary Committee on Trauma registry. All 3 groups showed similar trends with regard to type of trauma: penetrating injuries occurred most frequently, followed by blunt injuries for CDs and OpK9s. An equal proportion of blunt and blunt and penetrating traumas were observed in MWDs. Only MWDs sustained trauma from explosions, which accounted for 22.3% of injuries in this group. Animal bite/scratch/quilling and motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) were significantly more prevalent among CDs than MWDs (P < 0.01), whereas injuries from gunshot wounds (GSW) or a knife/sharp object were more common among MWDs compared to CDs (P < 0.01). No statistical differences in survival were observed between CDs and MWDs after excluding civilian dogs euthanized due to financial limitations.

Conclusions: MWDs, OpK9s, and CDs experience differences in injury type, mechanism, and outcome. Regardless, MWDs and CDs have good prognosis for survival to discharge after trauma.

Keywords: Military Working Dog; mechanism of injury; operational canine; trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. Giles JT. Role of human health care providers and medical treatment facilities in military working dog care and accessibility difficulties with military working dog blood products. US Army Med Dep J. 2016:1.
    1. Baker JL, Havas KA, Miller LA, et al. Gunshot wounds in military working dogs in Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom: 29 cases (2003-2009). J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2013;23(1):47-52.
    1. Takara MS, Harrell K. Noncombat-related injuries or illness incurred by military working dogs in a combat zone. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014;245(10):1124-1128.
    1. Miller L, Pacheco GJ, Janak JC, et al. A. Causes of death in military working dogs during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, 2001-2013. Military Medicine. 2018;183:467-474.
    1. Fleming JM, Creevy KE, Promislow DE. Mortality in North American dogs from 1984-2004: an investigation into age-, size-, and breed-related causes of death. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 2011;25(2):187-198.

LinkOut - more resources