Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 21;9(1):86.
doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00592-9.

Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC)

Affiliations

Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC)

Gianfranco Zuaboni et al. BMC Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Healthcare professionals can be a source of stigma and discrimination for people with mental illness, and anti-stigma programs are needed for this target group. However, there is no validated German language scale to assess attitudes of healthcare professionals towards people with mental illness. This study had the aim to validate the German language version of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC), a self-report measure of stigmatizing attitudes.

Methods: Staff (n = 392) on general psychiatric inpatient wards (excluding child, forensic and geriatric psychiatry) at five psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland (n = 3) and Germany (n = 2) participated in the study. The internal consistency of the OMS-HC was examined as well as its factor structure using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. To assess the scale's concurrent validity, we used the Social Distance Scale.

Results: Internal consistency for the OMS-HC total score was good (α = 0.74), acceptable for the subscales Attitudes (α = 0.62) and Social Distance (α = 0.69), and poor for the Disclosure subscale (α = 0.55). The original three-factor structure fit our data well. The OMS-HC total score and the Social Distance subscale score were significantly correlated with the Social Distance Scale, supporting concurrent validity.

Conclusion: The German version of the OMS-HC demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and can be recommended for future research and intervention evaluation.

Keywords: Attitudes; Mental illness; Psychometrics; Recovery; Social distance; Stigma; Therapeutic relationship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Factor loadings of the confirmatory factor analysis with three factors attitude, disclosure, and social distance. The dashed lines indicate which item was used for the scaling by fixing factor loadings. The figure was created using the semPlot R-package [25]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Farrelly S, Jeffery D, Rsch N, Williams P, Thornicroft G, Clement S. The link between mental health-related discrimination and suicidality: service user perspectives. Psychol Med. 2015;45(10):2013–2022. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714003158. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perry A, Lawrence V, Henderson C. Stigmatisation of those with mental health conditions in the acute general hospital setting. A qualitative framework synthesis. Soc Sci Med. 2020;255:112974. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112974. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henderson C, Noblett J, Parke H, Clement S, Caffrey A, Gale-Grant O, Schulze B, Druss B, Thornicroft G. Mental health-related stigma in health care and mental health-care settings. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1(6):467–482. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00023-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing stigma. Ann Rev Sociol. 2001;27(1):363–385. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363. - DOI
    1. von Peter S, Schulz G. 'I-as-We'Powerful boundaries within the field of mental health coproduction. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018;27:1292–1300. doi: 10.1111/inm.12469. - DOI - PubMed