Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):2456-2461.
eCollection 2021.

Comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy procedures in the radical hysterectomy surgery for endometrial cancer: a basic review

Affiliations
Review

Comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy procedures in the radical hysterectomy surgery for endometrial cancer: a basic review

Shadi Haddad et al. Am J Transl Res. .

Abstract

Gynecological cancers especially endometrial cancer have put a huge burden on health care systems in different societies. In this regard, different studies have evaluated screening, diagnosis and treatments of endometrial cancer. Different survival rates, prognosis and recurrence rates have been reported by variable treatment methods. Laparotomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (RH and LRH) are nowadays two most common surgical methods for endometrial cancer. In this systematic review, we investigated all article comparing two treatment techniques regarding RH and LRH in women with endometrial cancer who were classified as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I to III. Data regarding to blood loss and transfusion rate, operative time, duration of hospital stay, complications as intraoperative and postoperative, mean nodules counts, recurrent rate, adjuvant therapy were collected and analyzed. After reviewing five cohort studies, we indicated that laparoscopic procedures were better than laparotomy for managing endometrial cancer because the duration of hospitalization, blood loss and intraoperative and postoperative complications in laparoscopy procedure were lower than laparotomy procedures.

Keywords: Endometrial cancer; laparoscopy; laparotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature search and screening flowchart.

References

    1. Hüsing A, Dossus L, Ferrari P, Tjønneland A, Hansen L, Fagherazzi G, Baglietto L, Schock H, Chang-Claude J, Boeing H. An epidemiological model for prediction of endometrial cancer risk in Europe. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31:51–60. - PubMed
    1. Terry KL, Missmer SA. Epidemiology of ovarian and endometrial cancers. Pathology and Epidemiology of Cancer. Springer; 2017. pp. 233–246.
    1. Creasman WT. Editor Endometrial cancer: incidence, prognostic factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Semin Oncol. 1997;24:1–140. - PubMed
    1. Rafiee Zadeh A, Ghadimi K, Mohammadi B, Hatamian H, Naghibi SN, Danaeiniya A. Effects of estrogen and progesterone on different immune cells related to multiple sclerosis. Caspian J Neurol Sci. 2018;4:83–90.
    1. Mallozzi M, Leone C, Manurita F, Bellati F, Caserta D. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and endometrial cancer: an overview of recent laboratory evidence and epidemiological studies. I Int J Environ Res. 2017;14:334. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources