Interrater Reliability of NI-RADS on Posttreatment PET/Contrast-enhanced CT Scans in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- PMID: 34018845
- PMCID: PMC8183259
- DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2021200131
Interrater Reliability of NI-RADS on Posttreatment PET/Contrast-enhanced CT Scans in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the interrater reliability among radiologists examining posttreatment head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) fluorodeoxyglucose PET/contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans using Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, images in 80 patients with HNSCC who underwent posttreatment surveillance PET/CECT and immediate prior comparison CECT or PET/CECT (from June 2014 to July 2016) were uploaded to the American College of Radiology's cloud-based website, Cortex. Eight radiologists from seven institutions with variable NI-RADS experience independently evaluated each case and assigned an appropriate prose description and NI-RADS category for the primary site and the neck site. Five of these individuals were experienced readers (> 5 years of experience), and three were novices (< 5 years of experience). In total, 640 lexicon-based and NI-RADS categories were assigned to lesions among the 80 included patients by the eight radiologists. Light generalization of Cohen κ for interrater reliability was performed. Results Of the 80 included patients (mean age, 63 years ± 10 [standard deviation]), there were 58 men (73%); 60 patients had stage IV HNSCC (75%), and the most common tumor location was oropharynx (n = 32; 40%). Light κ for lexicon was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.36) at the primary site and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.37) at the neck site. Light κ for NI-RADS category was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.63) at the primary site and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.69) at the neck site. Percent agreement between lexicon and correlative NI-RADS category was 84.4% (540 of 640) at the primary site and 92.6% (593 of 640) at the neck site. There was no significant difference in interobserver agreement among the experienced versus novice raters. Conclusion Moderate agreement was achieved among eight radiologists using NI-RADS at posttreatment HNSCC surveillance imaging. Keywords: CT, PET/CT, Head/Neck, Neck, Neoplasms-Primary, Observer Performance Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.
Keywords: CT; Head/Neck; Neck; Neoplasms-Primary; Observer Performance; PET/CT.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Interrater Reliability among Radiologists Reading PET/Contrast-enhanced CT Scans Using NI-RADS: Methodologic Issues.Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021 Sep;3(5):e210062. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2021210062. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34533377 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Aiken AH, Rath TJ, Anzai Y, et al. . ACR Neck Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (NI-RADS): A White Paper of the ACR NI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15(8):1097–1108. - PubMed
-
- Juliano AF, Aiken AH. NI-RADS for head and neck cancer surveillance imaging: What, why, and how. Cancer Cytopathol 2020;128(3):166–170. - PubMed
-
- Aiken AH, Hudgins PA. Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018;26(1):51–62. - PubMed
-
- Hsu D, Juliano AF. Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System: Principles and Implementation. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2020;30(3):369–377. - PubMed
-
- Ong SC, Schöder H, Lee NY, et al. . Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the neck after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional advanced head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med 2008;49(4):532–540. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
