Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 21;10(2):e22269.
doi: 10.2196/22269.

Ethical Issues in Patient Data Ownership

Affiliations

Ethical Issues in Patient Data Ownership

Varsha Chiruvella et al. Interact J Med Res. .

Abstract

Patient data have conventionally been thought to be well protected by the privacy laws outlined in the United States. The increasing interest of for-profit companies in acquiring the databases of large health care systems poses new challenges to the protection of patients' privacy. It also raises ethical concerns of sharing patient data with entities that may exploit it for commercial interests and even target vulnerable populations. Recognizing that every breach in the confidentiality of large databases exposes millions of patients to the potential of being exploited is important in framing new rules for governing the sharing of patient data. Similarly, the ethical aspects of data voluntarily and altruistically provided by patients for research, which may be exploited for commercial interests due to patient data sharing between health care entities and third-party companies, need to be addressed. The rise of technologies such as artificial intelligence and the availability of personal data gleaned by data vendor companies place American patients at risk of being exploited both intentionally and inadvertently because of the sharing of their data by their health care provider institutions and third-party entities.

Keywords: data; ownership; privacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Gillum RF. From papyrus to the electronic tablet: a brief history of the clinical medical record with lessons for the digital age. Am J Med. 2013 Oct;126(10):853–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evans RS. Electronic health records: then, now, and in the future. Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Mar 06;25(S 01):48–61. doi: 10.15265/iys-2016-s006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Committee on Improving the Patient Record . In: The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care, Revised Edition. Detmer DE, Steen EB, Dick RS, editors. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press; 1997. pp. 1–256. - PubMed
    1. Berner ES. Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2004 Oct 18;12(1):3–7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1664. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Retention and Destruction of Health Information 2013. The American Health Information Management Association. 2013. [2021-03-01]. https://library.ahima.org/PB/RetentionDestruction#.Xt8XH25FzRN.

LinkOut - more resources