Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Sep 1;114(3):1148-1158.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab150.

Effect on gut microbiota of a 1-y lifestyle intervention with Mediterranean diet compared with energy-reduced Mediterranean diet and physical activity promotion: PREDIMED-Plus Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect on gut microbiota of a 1-y lifestyle intervention with Mediterranean diet compared with energy-reduced Mediterranean diet and physical activity promotion: PREDIMED-Plus Study

Jananee Muralidharan et al. Am J Clin Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: The Mediterranean diet is a well-recognized healthy diet that has shown to induce positive changes in gut microbiota. Lifestyle changes such as diet along with physical activity could aid in weight loss and improve cardiovascular risk factors.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of an intensive lifestyle weight loss intervention on gut microbiota.

Methods: This is a substudy of the PREDIMED-Plus (Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea-Plus), a randomized controlled trial conducted in overweight/obese men and women (aged 55-75 y) with metabolic syndrome. The intervention group (IG) underwent an intensive weight loss lifestyle intervention based on an energy-restricted Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) and physical activity promotion, and the control group (CG) underwent a non-energy-restricted MedDiet for 1 y. Anthropometric, biochemical, and gut microbial 16S rRNA sequencing data were analyzed at baseline (n = 362) and 1-y follow-up (n = 343).

Results: IG participants had a weight loss of 4.2 (IQR, -6.8, -2.5) kg compared with 0.2 (IQR, -2.1, 1.4) kg in the CG (P < 0.001). Reductions in BMI, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and triglycerides and an increase in HDL cholesterol were greater in IG than in CG participants (P < 0.05). We observed a decrease in Butyricicoccus, Haemophilus, Ruminiclostridium 5, and Eubacterium hallii in the IG compared with the CG. Many genera shifted in the same direction within both intervention groups, indicating an overall effect of the MedDiet. Decreases in Haemophilus, Coprococcus 3, and few other genera were associated with a decrease in adiposity parameters in both intervention groups. Changes in Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 were positively associated with changes in MedDiet adherence.

Conclusions: Weight loss induced by an energy-restricted MedDiet and physical activity induce changes in gut microbiota. The role of MedDiet-induced changes on the host might be via short-chain fatty acid producing bacteria, whereas with energy restriction, these changes might be modulated with other mechanisms, which need to be explored in future studies. This trial was registered at http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN89898870 as ISRCT 89898870.

Keywords: Mediterranean diet; energy restriction; gut microbiota; obesity; weight loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of weighted UniFrac distance showing 2 groups of intervention at 2 time points. (B) PCoA of unweighted UniFrac distance. (C) PCoA of Bray–Curtis distance (n = 343). CB, control group at baseline; CO, control group at year 1; TB, intervention group at baseline; TO, intervention group at year 1.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Venn diagram representing IG and CG by genera varying within groups evaluated with MetagenomeSeq and having a variable importance in projection  >1 from the sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis model. Genera shifting in the same direction as well in opposite directions within each intervention groups are shown. CG, control group; IG, intervention group.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Heat plot showing associations in overall study population (n = 343) between changes in microbial genera and clinical variables. Model evaluated by negative binomial mixed model, adjusting for covariates sex, study center, and baseline body weight; adjusted P value denoted by ***P  < 0.001, **P < 0.05, *P < 0.1, and ºP < 0.2.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Heat plot showing associations in overall study population (n = 343) between changes in microbial genera and energy intake variables. Model evaluated by negative binomial mixed model, adjusting for covariates sex, study center, and baseline body weight; adjusted P value denoted by ***P  < 0.001, **P < 0.05, *P < 0.1, and ºP < 0.2.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Heat map representing median values of significantly increasing or decreasing predicted metagenome pathways in the IG (n = 171) and CG (n = 172). CG, control group; IG, intervention group.

References

    1. Rodriguez-Castaño GP, Caro-Quintero A, Reyes A, Lizcano F. Advances in gut microbiome research, opening new strategies to cope with a Western lifestyle. Front Genet. 2017;7:224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lippert K, Kedenko L, Antonielli L, Kedenko I, Gemeier C, Leitner M, Kautzky-Willer A, Paulweber B, Hackl E. Gut microbiota dysbiosis associated with glucose metabolism disorders and the metabolic syndrome in older adults. Benef Microbes. 2017;8:545–56. - PubMed
    1. Crovesy L, Masterson D, Rosado EL. Profile of the gut microbiota of adults with obesity: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74:1251–62. - PubMed
    1. Hu H-J, Park S-G, Jang HB, Choi M-G, Park K-H, Kang JH, Park SI, Lee H-J, Cho S-H. Obesity alters the microbial community profile in Korean adolescents. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134333. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duncan SH, Lobley GE, Holtrop G, Ince J, Johnstone AM, Louis P, Flint HJ. Human colonic microbiota associated with diet, obesity and weight loss. Int J Obes. 2008;32:1720–4. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data