Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women with a normal cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
- PMID: 34020724
- PMCID: PMC8139044
- DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01702-9
Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women with a normal cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Abstract
Background: Preterm birth (PTB) is estimated to affect 14.9 million babies globally every year. Global rates of PTB continue to increase from 9.8 to 10.6% over a 15-year period from 2000 to 2014. Vaginal progesterone is commonly used by clinicians as a prevention strategy, with recent evidence affirming the benefit of vaginal (micronised) progesterone to prevent PTB in women with a shortened cervix (< 25 mm). Given the low incidence of a short cervix at mid-gestation in high-risk populations further evidence is required. The objective of this review is to determine if vaginal progesterone reduces spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) before 37 weeks in asymptomatic high-risk women with a singleton pregnancy with a normal mid-gestation cervical length.
Methods: Studies will be sourced from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Register of Trials (CENTRAL) from their inception onwards with the search terms 'progesterone' and 'preterm birth'. Studies will be screened and included if they assess vaginal progesterone compared to placebo in women with a normal cervical length. The primary outcome will be sPTB < 37 weeks, with secondary outcomes of sPTB < 34 weeks. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening at abstract and full text level, data extraction and risk of bias assessment with disagreements resolved by an experienced researcher. The Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and random effects analysis model will be used to produce treatment effect odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Discussion: This review will assess the current body of evidence and provide clarity regarding the potential benefits and best practice of use of vaginal progesterone in asymptomatic women with high-risk singleton pregnancies and normal cervical length.
Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42020152051.
Keywords: Cervical; Preterm birth; Progesterone.
Conflict of interest statement
J.P. is supported by the Hunter New England Health Local Health District Clinical and Health Service Research Fellowship Scheme. The authors declare that they have no other competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women with a normal cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):7093-7101. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1943657. Epub 2021 Jul 1. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022. PMID: 34210207
-
Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 24;9(9):CD012871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012871.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32970845 Free PMC article.
-
Early vaginal progesterone versus placebo in twin pregnancies for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a randomized, double-blind trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):86.e1-86.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.050. Epub 2020 Jun 26. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32598909 Clinical Trial.
-
Vaginal progesterone, oral progesterone, 17-OHPC, cerclage, and pessary for preventing preterm birth in at-risk singleton pregnancies: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):556-567. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15566. Epub 2018 Dec 29. BJOG. 2019. PMID: 30480871
-
Treatment options and recommendations to reduce preterm births in women with short cervix.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Jul;57 Suppl 1:S12-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00210.x. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012. PMID: 22776244
Cited by
-
Progesterone, cerclage, pessary, or acetylsalicylic acid for prevention of preterm birth in singleton and multifetal pregnancies - A systematic review and meta-analyses.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 28;10:1111315. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1111315. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36936217 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller A-B, Narwal R, Adler A, Vera Garcia C, Rohde S, Say L, Lawn JE. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–2172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller A-B, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan D, Landoulsi S, Jampathong N, Kongwattanakul K, Laopaiboon M, Lewis C, Rattanakanokchai S, Teng DN, Thinkhamrop J, Watananirun K, Zhang J, Zhou W, Glmezoglu AM. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(1):e37–e46. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30451-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- WHO recommended definitions terminology format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period use of a new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Modifications recommended by FIGO as amended October 14, 1976. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56:247–253. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources