Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 21;11(5):e044134.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044134.

Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders

Jasmine Jean Hooper  1 , Lisa Saulsman  2 , Tammy Hall  3 , Flavie Waters  2   3
Affiliations

Addressing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: learning from a systematic review of early interventions for frontline responders

Jasmine Jean Hooper et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Protecting healthcare workers from psychological harm is an urgent clinical issue within the current COVID-19 pandemic. Research on early psychological programmes that aim to prevent or reduce mental health symptoms and that have been tested in frontline responders may assist service providers with choosing a suitable intervention for rapid dissemination in healthcare settings.

Design and outcome measures: First, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched through a systematic literature review of early psychological interventions administered to frontline responders in the last 15 years. Interventions were included if they were designed to prevent or reduce psychological impact and had outcome measures of psychological distress (eg, general psychopathology, post-traumatic stress disorder and stress) and/or positive mental health domains (eg, resilience, self-efficacy and life satisfaction). Second, the suitability of these programmes for the healthcare workforce was evaluated according to the criteria of effectiveness, content applicability and feasibility.

Results: Of 320 articles retrieved, 12 relevant studies were included that described six early psychological interventions. Although the evidence base is limited, psychological first aid, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing, and trauma risk management showed effectiveness across at least two studies each with frontline workers. Resilience and coping for the healthcare community; anticipate, plan, and deter; and resilience at work programmes found promising results in single studies. Concerning other suitability criteria, all programmes appear applicable to healthcare settings and have acceptable feasibility for rapid implementation.

Conclusions: Despite the limited evidence, several interventions were identified as potentially suitable and useful for improving psychological functioning of healthcare workers across a variety of disaster situations. Service providers should continue to implement and evaluate early psychological interventions in frontline workers in order to refine best practices for managing the psychological impact of future disasters.

Keywords: COVID-19; health policy; mental health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kleim B, Westphal M. Mental health in first responders: a review and recommendation for prevention and intervention strategies. Traumatology 2011;17:17–24. 10.1177/1534765611429079 - DOI
    1. Mao X, Fung OWM, Hu X, et al. . Psychological impacts of disaster on rescue workers: a review of the literature. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 2018;27:602–17. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.020 - DOI
    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration . National survey on drug use and health: methodological summary and definitions. 2019. Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2018. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
    1. Arpacioglu S, Gurler M, Cakiroglu S. Secondary traumatization outcomes and associated factors among the health care workers exposed to the COVID-19. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2020:002076402094074. 10.1177/0020764020940742 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ray SL, Wong C, White D. Work life conditions, and burnout among frontline mental health care professionals. Traumatology 2013;19:255–67.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources