Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 10;72(14):5158-5179.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab226.

In pursuit of a better world: crop improvement and the CGIAR

Affiliations
Review

In pursuit of a better world: crop improvement and the CGIAR

Jana Kholová et al. J Exp Bot. .

Abstract

The CGIAR crop improvement (CI) programs, unlike commercial CI programs, which are mainly geared to profit though meeting farmers' needs, are charged with meeting multiple objectives with target populations that include both farmers and the community at large. We compiled the opinions from >30 experts in the private and public sector on key strategies, methodologies, and activities that could the help CGIAR meet the challenges of providing farmers with improved varieties while simultaneously meeting the goals of: (i) nutrition, health, and food security; (ii) poverty reduction, livelihoods, and jobs; (iii) gender equality, youth, and inclusion; (iv) climate adaptation and mitigation; and (v) environmental health and biodiversity. We review the crop improvement processes starting with crop choice, moving through to breeding objectives, production of potential new varieties, selection, and finally adoption by farmers. The importance of multidisciplinary teams working towards common objectives is stressed as a key factor to success. The role of the distinct disciplines, actors, and their interactions throughout the process from crop choice through to adoption by farmers is discussed and illustrated.

Keywords: Agricultural policy; CGIAR; GxExMxS; breeder; crop improvement; cultivar; food security; multi-disciplinary; production.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The schematic overview of the manuscript logics and structure. It illustrates the main processes involved in successful conceiving, creating, releasing, and adoption of new crop technologies.

References

    1. Agarwal B, Agrawal A. 2017. Do farmers really like farming? Indian farmers in transition. Oxford Development Studies 4, 45.
    1. Agwu AE, Anyaeche CL. 2007. Adoption of improved cassava varieties in six rural communities in Anambra State, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 6, 089–098.
    1. Alary V, Yigez AY, Bassi FM. 2020. Participatory farmers-weighted selection (PWS) indices to raise adoption of durum cultivars. Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics 2, e200014.
    1. Alston JM, Marra MC, Pardey PG, Wyatt TJ. 2000. Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 44, 185–215.
    1. Alston JM, Pardey PG, Rao X. 2020. The payoff to investing in CGIAR research. https://supportagresearch.org/assets/pdf/Payoff_to_Investing_in_CGIAR_Re...

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources