Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;34(4):e14999.
doi: 10.1111/dth.14999. Epub 2021 May 31.

Fractional CO2 laser to improve noticeable scars after skin cancer surgery: An appraisal by the patients, laypersons, and experts

Nina Wyss  1 , Nicole Graf  2 , Juerg Hafner  1   3 , Laurence Imhof  1   3
Affiliations

Fractional CO2 laser to improve noticeable scars after skin cancer surgery: An appraisal by the patients, laypersons, and experts

Nina Wyss et al. Dermatol Ther. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Ablative fractionated carbon dioxide (fCO2 ) laser may be a useful tool to improve noticeable scars after skin cancer surgery. Therefore we evaluated 40 patients who have been treated with fCO2 laser for facial scars after skin cancer surgery. This retrospective study is based on blinded evaluation of pre- and postoperative photographs. Patients (n = 40), laypersons (n = 5) and experts (n = 5) evaluated the esthetics and the Vancouver scar scale as primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included patient satisfaction and treatment safety. Patients, laypersons and experts consistently assessed a significant improvement of scar quality and appearance after fCO2 laser treatment, which was paralleled by high patient satisfaction. In conclusion, ablative fCO2 laser is effective in improving noticeable postsurgical scars. Patients are highly satisfied with post-laser results.

Keywords: facial scars; fractional CO2 laser treatment; skin cancer surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Comparison of the median esthetics scores, evaluated by patients
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Comparison of the median esthetics scores, evaluated by the layperson and experts
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Patient 1: pre‐treatment photograph
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Patient 1: post‐treatment photograph
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Patient 2: pre‐treatment photograph
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Patient 2: post‐treatment photograph
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ngaage M, Agius M. The psychology of scars: a mini‐review. Psychiatr Danub. 2018;30(7):633‐638. - PubMed
    1. Anderson RR, Donelan MB, Hivnor C, et al. Laser treatment of traumatic scars with an emphasis on ablative fractional laser resurfacing: consensus report. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(2):187‐193. - PubMed
    1. Baca ME, Neaman KC, Rapp DA, Burton ME, Mann RJ, Renucci JD. Reduction of post‐surgical scarring with the use of ablative fractional CO2 lasers: a pilot study using a porcine model. Lasers Surg Med. 2017;49(1):122‐128. - PubMed
    1. Cervelli V, Gentile P, Spallone D, et al. Ultrapulsed fractional CO2 laser for the treatment of post‐traumatic and pathological scars. J Drugs Dermatol. 2010;9(11):1328‐1331. - PubMed
    1. Ibrahim SM, Saudi WM, Abozeid MF, Elsaie ML. Early fractional carbon dioxide laser intervention for postsurgical scars in skin of color. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019;12:29‐34. - PMC - PubMed