Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul:262:166-173.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.026. Epub 2021 May 14.

Exploring the reporting standards of RCTs involving invasive procedures for assisted vaginal birth: A systematic review

Emily J Hotton  1 , Sophie Renwick  2 , Erik Lenguerrand  3 , Julia Wade  4 , Tim J Draycott  2 , Joanna F Crofts  2 , Natalie S Blencowe  5
Affiliations

Exploring the reporting standards of RCTs involving invasive procedures for assisted vaginal birth: A systematic review

Emily J Hotton et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) is a complex intervention involving medical devices, comprising multiple components. This complexity creates difficulties when designing and conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs), in terms of describing, standardising and monitoring the intervention, and accounting for differing clinician expertise. This review examines the reporting standards of complex interventions involving a medical device, in the context of AVB RCTs.

Study design: Searches were undertaken from the start of indexing to March 2021, and limited to RCTs, feasibility and pilot studies including at least one device for AVB. RCTs were selected if they included participants having an AVB with any device, with or without a comparator group. Reporting details were assessed according to the Consolidating Standards of Reporting Trials extension for non-pharmacological treatments (CONSORT-NPT), focusing on intervention descriptions, standardization, adherence and clinician expertise. Screening of abstracts, full-text articles and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers.

Results: Of 4098 abstracts and 83 full-text articles, 39 papers were included, investigating 80 interventions. Twenty-seven different named devices were identified. Intervention descriptions were provided in 20 (55%) papers with varying levels of detail and with only one covering the entire procedure. Standardization of interventions was mentioned in 25 papers (64%). Only eight (21%) papers reported any form of adherence to the intended procedure. Some data regarding expertise were reported in 25 (64%) papers.

Conclusions: Despite some compliance with reporting standards, there is a lack of detail regarding intervention description, standardization, adherence and expertise in RCTs of AVB. This creates difficulties in understanding how intervention delivery was intended and what actually occurred. Clearer guidelines for the reporting of invasive procedures and devices are required.

Keywords: Assisted vaginal birth; Complex interventions; Forceps; Odon Device; Reporting standards; Ventouse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest EJH, SR, JFC, TJD are employees of North Bristol NHS Trust, which receives funding from PROMPT Maternity Foundation (PMF) to pay part of their salaries. PMF has received funds from Becton Dickinson, manufacturer of the Odon Device to run pre-clinical simulation studies on the device. EL is an employee of the University of Bristol, which receives funding from PMF to pay part of EL’s salary. NSB is an MRC Clinician Scientist.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of papers throughout the systematic review, according to PRISMA criteria [43].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Engaging women to set the research agenda for assisted vaginal birth.
    Torloni MR, Campos LF, Coullaut A, Hartmann K, Opiyo N, Bohren M, Bonet M, Betrán AP. Torloni MR, et al. Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14054. doi: 10.1111/hex.14054. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 38877659 Free PMC article.
  • A research agenda to improve incidence and outcomes of assisted vaginal birth.
    Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Althabe F, Altieri E, Arulkumaran S, Ashraf F, Bailey P, Bonet M, Bucagu M, Clark E, Changizi N, Churchill R, Dominico S, Downe S, Draycott T, Faye A, Feeley C, Geelhoed D, Gherissi A, Gholbzouri K, Grupta G, Hailegebriel TD, Hanson C, Hartmann K, Hassan L, Hofmeyr GJ, Jayathilaka AC, Kabore C, Kidula N, Kingdon C, Kuzmenko O, Lumbiganon P, Mola GD, Moran A, de Muncio B, Nolens B, Opiyo N, Pattinson RC, Romero M, van Roosmalen J, Siaulys MM, Camelo JS, Smith J, Sobel HL, Sobhy S, Sosa C, Souza JP, Ten Hoope-Bender P, Thangaratinam S, Varallo J, Wright A, Yates A, Oladapo OO. Betrán AP, et al. Bull World Health Organ. 2023 Nov 1;101(11):723-729. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.290140. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Bull World Health Organ. 2023. PMID: 37961052 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Hirshberg A., Srinivas S.K. Role of operative vaginal deliveries in prevention of cesarean deliveries. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(2):256–262. - PubMed
    1. O’Brien S., Hotton E.J., Lenguerrand E., Winter C., Draycott T.J., Crofts J.F. The ASSIST Study - the BD Odon Device for assisted vaginal birth: a safety and feasibility study. Trials. 2019;20(1) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craig P., Dieppe P., Macintyre S., Michie S., Nazareth I., Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2008;337:a1655. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ciani O., Wilcher B., Blankart C.R., Hatz M., Rupel V.P., Erker R.S. Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European union agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(January (3)):154–165. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tarricone R., Torbica A., Ferré F., Drummond M. Generating appropriate clinical data for value assessment of medical devices: what role does regulation play? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14(October (5)):707–718. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources