Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 1;26(4):e474-e481.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.24335.

Buccal fat pad excision for cheek refinement: A systematic review

B Traboulsi-Garet  1 , O Camps-Font, M Traboulsi-Garet, C Gay-Escoda
Affiliations

Buccal fat pad excision for cheek refinement: A systematic review

B Traboulsi-Garet et al. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. .

Abstract

Background: Buccal Fat Pad (BFP) excision has become an aesthetic surgical procedure. Although this procedure is quite common, it is important to bear in mind that the scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of this treatment is scarce and of low quality. The purpose of this systematic review was to analyse all relevant data to assess the efficacy and safety of BFP excision for improving midface aesthetics.

Material and methods: A thorough search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. The PICO approach was used where healthy patients seeking cheek slimming and facial silhouette refining undergo BFP excision and were compared before and after surgery in terms of BFP volume reduction, adverse effects and patient satisfaction.

Results: Of the 1,413 references identified, 4 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Only one study reported BFP volume reduction, which was 3.10 mL (95%CI: 2.38 to 3.80; P < 0.001), and the mean volume of the excised tissue was 2.74 ± 0.69 mL (range, 1.8-4.9 mL). 84.6% of the patients stated that their facial contour was much better and the remaining 15.4% noticed that the appearance of their cheeks following BFP excision was better. Seven complications were reported in the 134 cheek refinement procedures.

Conclusions: BFP removal has an initially favorable outcome for facial aesthetics and a low postoperative complication rate, however, there are many procedures being performed with poor quality methodology and there is also a lack of published data on its long-term follow-up results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest None of the authors have any relevant financial relationship(s) with a commercial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Shoja M, Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shokouhi G, Ardalan MR. Marie-Francois Xavier Bichat (1771-1802) and his contributions to the foundations of pathological anatomy and modern medicine. Ann Anat. 2008;190:413–20. - PubMed
    1. Singh J, Prasad K, Lalitha RM, Ranganath K. Buccal pad of fat and its applications in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A review of published literature (February) 2004 to (July) 2009. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110:698–705. - PubMed
    1. Tideman H, Bosanquet A, Scott J. Use of the buccal fat pad as a pedicled graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:435–40. - PubMed
    1. Jackson IT. Buccal fat pad removal. Aesthetic Surg J. 2003;23:484–5. - PubMed
    1. Matarasso A. Buccal fat pad excision: Aesthetic improvement of the midface. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;26:413–8. - PubMed

Publication types