Morphologic analysis of alveolar bone in maxillary and mandibular incisors on sagittal views
- PMID: 34023911
- DOI: 10.1007/s00276-020-02640-2
Morphologic analysis of alveolar bone in maxillary and mandibular incisors on sagittal views
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the morphologic features of alveolus in relatively healthy maxillary and mandibular incisors using cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT).
Methods: CBCT images of 318 patients were retrospectively acquired. Alveolar bone in incisive area was divided into: type 1 (thick), type 2 (relatively thick with mono-plate concavity), type 3 (thin with double-plate concavities), and type 4 (vulnerably thin). Alveolus prevalence and widths were analyzed statistically relative to age, gender, and molar relationship.
Results: Prevalence of type 1 alveolus was 78.9% in maxillary central incisors, 15.1% in maxillary lateral incisors, 24.1% in mandibular central incisors, and 5.0% in mandibular lateral incisors. Type 2 alveolus was commonly observed in the maxillary lateral incisors (82.2%), mandibular central incisors (66.2%), and mandibular lateral incisors (87.9%). Prevalence of type 3 and 4 alveoli ranged from 0.0 to 9.4%. As for maxillary central incisors, type 1 was the widest both at the alveolar crest (7.77 ± 0.58 mm) and apical area (9.05 ± 1.86 mm), while type 3 had the lowest width at the apical region (4.08 ± 0.51 mm). Among maxillary central incisors, prevalence of type 1 tended to decrease with age. At all maxillary and mandibular incisor sites, alveolus widths were significantly thicker in males than in females. At maxillary lateral incisor and mandibular incisor sites, prevalence of alveolus type was significantly different among three molar relationships.
Conclusion: A 4-type classification system was suggested for alveolus morphology in incisive region. Identification of alveolus type might aid in the corresponding treatment.
Keywords: Alveolus; Cone-beam computed tomography; Mandibular incisor; Maxillary incisor; Morphology.
Similar articles
-
Three-dimensional evaluation of labial alveolar bone overlying the maxillary and mandibular incisors in different skeletal classifications of malocclusion.Int Orthod. 2019 Jun;17(2):287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 20. Int Orthod. 2019. PMID: 31015017
-
[Investigation of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary alveolar bone: a cone-beam CT study in 300 cases with normal occlusion].Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 9;52(10):631-636. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.10.010. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 29972938 Chinese.
-
Cone beam computed tomographic measurement of maxillary central incisors to determine prevalence of facial alveolar bone width ≥2 mm.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):595-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00287.x. Epub 2010 May 11. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 20491811
-
Morphology and root canal configuration of maxillary lateral incisors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74026-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39341889 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing open gingival embrasures in orthodontic treatment: a retrospective clinical study.Prog Orthod. 2025 Feb 21;26(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40510-025-00554-6. Prog Orthod. 2025. PMID: 39982591 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Characteristics of mandibular anterior alveolar bone in patients with different degrees of periodontitis: a retrospective study based on CBCT.Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Nov;27(11):6709-6721. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05280-z. Epub 2023 Sep 30. Clin Oral Investig. 2023. PMID: 37777638
-
Measurement of Thickness at the Inferior Border of the Mandible Using Computed Tomography Images: A Retrospective Study including 300 Japanese Cases.Tomography. 2023 Jun 22;9(4):1236-1245. doi: 10.3390/tomography9040098. Tomography. 2023. PMID: 37489466 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the Sagittal Root Position of the Maxillary and Mandibular Anterior Teeth in the Alveolar Bone Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 6;14(23):2756. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232756. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39682664 Free PMC article.
References
-
- AlTarawneh S, AlHadidi A, Hamdan AA, Shaqman M, Habib E (2018) Assessment of bone dimensions in the anterior maxilla: a cone beam computed tomography study. J Prosthodont 27:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12675 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D (2011) Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Period Rest Dent 31:125–131
-
- Casanova-Sarmiento JA, Arriola-Guillen LE, Ruiz-Mora GA, Rodriguez-Cardenas YA, Aliaga-Del Castillo A (2020) Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: a CBCT Study. Int Orthod 18:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, Shahim K, Nolte LP, Buser D (2013) Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: a 3D analysis with CBCT. J Dent Res 92:195S-201S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513506713 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cho HJ, Jeon JY, Ahn SJ, Lee SW, Chung JR, Park CJ, Hwang KG (2019) The preliminary study for three-dimensional alveolar bone morphologic characteristics for alveolar bone restoration. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 41:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0216-2 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials