Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;28(9):5194-5204.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10070-6. Epub 2021 May 22.

Re-Irradiation in Patients with Recurrent Rectal Cancer is Safe and Feasible

Affiliations

Re-Irradiation in Patients with Recurrent Rectal Cancer is Safe and Feasible

Esmée A Dijkstra et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus yet for the best treatment regimen in patients with recurrent rectal cancer (RRC). This study aims to evaluate toxicity and oncological outcomes after re-irradiation in patients with RRC in our center. Clinical (cCR) and pathological complete response (pCR) rates and radicality were also studied.

Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2018, 61 locally advanced RRC patients were treated and analyzed retrospectively. Patients received radiotherapy at a dose of 30.0-30.6 Gy (reCRT) or 50.0-50.4 Gy chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in cases of no prior irradiation because of low-risk primary rectal cancer. In both groups, patients received capecitabine concomitantly.

Results: In total, 60 patients received the prescribed neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy followed by surgery, 35 patients (58.3%) in the reRCT group and 25 patients (41.7%) in the long-course CRT group. There were no significant differences in overall survival (p = 0.82), disease-free survival (p = 0.63), and local recurrence-free survival (p = 0.17) between the groups. Patients in the long-course CRT group reported more skin toxicity after radiotherapy (p = 0.040). No differences were observed in late toxicity. In the long-course CRT group, a significantly higher cCR rate was observed (p = 0.029); however, there was no difference in the pCR rate (p = 0.66).

Conclusions: The treatment of RRC patients with re-irradiation is comparable to treatment with long-course CRT regarding toxicity and oncological outcomes. In the reCRT group, less cCR was observed, although there was no difference in pCR. The findings in this study suggest that it is safe and feasible to re-irradiate RRC patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Esmée A. Dijkstra, Véronique E.M. Mul, Patrick H.J. Hemmer, Klaas Havenga, Prof. Geke A.P. Hospers, Christina T. Muijs, and Boudewijn van Etten declare no conflicts of interest, commercial support, financial support, or material support in relation to this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall survival. CRT chemoradiotherapy, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Disease-free survival. CRT chemoradiotherapy, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Local recurrence-free survival. CRT chemoradiotherapy, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

Comment in

References

    1. Braendengen M, Tveit KM, Berglund A, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing preoperative radiotherapy with chemoradiotherapy in nonresectable rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(22):3687–3694. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3858.A. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosset J-F, Collette L, Calais G, et al. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(11):1114–1123. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa060829. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1731–1740. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Gijn W, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(6):575–582. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70097-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Endreseth BH, Myrvold HE, Romundstad P, Hestvik UE, Bjerkeset T, Wibe A. Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(7):1380–1388. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0044-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources