Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;28(38):53239-53248.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14443-y. Epub 2021 May 23.

Biodegradability and toxicity of dodecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride in sea water

Affiliations

Biodegradability and toxicity of dodecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride in sea water

José María Quiroga et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Studies were conducted to assess the biodegradability and toxicity of the cationic surfactant dodecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride (DTMAC) in sea water samples collected from the Gulf of Cadiz (Spain). Ultimate biodegradation was studied following the guideline proposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Growth inhibition tests on five marine microalgae species and mortality tests on a marine crustacean (Artemia franciscana) were carried out. Biodegradation process was modelled according to a logistic kinetic model. Lag time and half-life were 15.17 and 26.95 days, respectively. Depending on the microalgae, 96-h EC50 values ranged from 0.69 to 6.34 mg L-1 DTMAC, respectively. 48-h and 72-h LC50 to A. franciscana were 46.74 and 34.19 mg L-1 DTMAC, respectively. The results indicate that DTMAC can be mineralised in sea water. Marine crustacean was more resistant than the microalgae. Surfactant tolerance on microalgae followed this order: T. chuii > N. gaditana > C. gracilis ≈ I. galbana ≈ D. salina, being the Green microalgae T. chuii the most tolerant.

Keywords: A. franciscana; Biodegradation; DTMAC; Index term; Microalga; Surfactant.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W, Thomaidis NS, Xu J (2017) Progress in the biological and chemical treatment technologies for emerging contaminant removal from wastewater: a critical review. J Hazard Mater 323:274–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.045 - DOI
    1. Garcia MT, Ribosa I, Guindulain T, Sanchez-Leal J, Vives-Rego J (2001) Fate and effect of monoalkyl quaternary ammonium surfactants in the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 111:169–175 - DOI
    1. Garcia MT, Kaczerewska O, Ribosa I, Brycki B, Materna P, Drgas M (2016) Biodegradability and aquatic toxicity of quaternary ammonium-based gemini surfactants: effect of the spacer on their ecological properties. Chemosphere 154(2016):155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.109 - DOI
    1. GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators 2016 (2016) GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet 388(10053):1659–1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8 - DOI
    1. Geerts R, van Ginkel CG, Plugge CM (2015) Accurate assessment of the biodegradation of cationic surfactants in activated sludge reactors (OECD TG 303A). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 118(2015):83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.04.013 - DOI

Substances

LinkOut - more resources