Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020;34(3):137-158.
doi: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000243. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

Conducting Event-Related Potential (ERP) Research with Young Children: A Review of Components, Special Considerations and Recommendations for Research on Cognition and Emotion

Rebecca J Brooker  1 , John E Bates  2 , Kristin A Buss  3 , Mara J Canen  4 , Tracy A Dennis-Tiwary  5 , Lisa M Gatzke-Kopp  3 , Caroline Hoyniak  2 , Daniel N Klein  6 , Autumn Kujawa  7 , Ayelet Lahat  8 , Connie Lamm  9 , Jason S Moser  10 , Isaac T Petersen  11 , Alva Tang  8 , Steven Woltering  1 , Louis A Schmidt  8
Affiliations

Conducting Event-Related Potential (ERP) Research with Young Children: A Review of Components, Special Considerations and Recommendations for Research on Cognition and Emotion

Rebecca J Brooker et al. J Psychophysiol. 2020.

Abstract

There has been an unprecedented increase in the number of research studies employing event-related potential (ERP) techniques to examine dynamic and rapidly-occurring neural processes with children during the preschool and early childhood years. Despite this, there has been little discussion of the methodological and procedural differences that exist for studies of young children versus older children and adults. That is, reviewers, editors, and consumers of this work often expect developmental studies to simply apply adult techniques and procedures to younger samples. Procedurally, this creates unrealistic expectations for research paradigms, data collection, and data reduction and analyses. Scientifically, this leads to inappropriate measures and methods that hinder drawing conclusions and advancing theory. Based on ERP work with preschoolers and young children from 10 laboratories across North America, we present a summary of the most common ERP components under study in the area of emotion and cognition in young children along with 13 realistic expectations for data collection and loss, laboratory procedures and paradigms, data processing, ERP averaging, and typical challenges for conducting this type of work. This work is intended to supplement previous guidelines for work with adults and offer insights to aid researchers, reviewers, and editors in the design and evaluation of developmental research using ERPs. Here we make recommendations for researchers who plan to conduct or who are conducting ERP studies in children between ages 2 and 12, focusing on studies of toddlers and preschoolers. Recommendations are based on both data and our cumulative experience and include guidelines for laboratory setup, equipment and recording settings, task design, and data processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of child-friendly setup for EEG collection room
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example child friendly stimuli for go/no-go and flanker tasks
Figure 3
Figure 3
Most common reasons for data loss in child ERP studies
Figure 4
Figure 4
Summary of recommendations for conducting ERP work with young children
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bartholow BD, Pearson MA, Dickter CL, Sher KJ, Fabiani M, & Gratton G (2005). Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: Beyond errors and response conflict. Psychophysiology, 42(1), 33–42. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00258.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belden AC, Irvin K, Hajcak G, Kappenman ES, Kelly D, Karlow S, … Barch DM (2016). Neural correlates of reward processing in depressed and healthy preschool-age children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55(12), 1081–1089. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.503 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell MA, & Cuevas K (2012). Using EEG to study cognitive development: Issues and practices. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(3), 281–294. doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.691143 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell MA, & Wolfe CD (2008). The use of the electroencephalogram in research on cognitive development. In Schmidt LA & Segalowitz SJ (Eds.), Developmental Psychophysiology (pp. 150–170). New York, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Biederman J, Hirshfeld-Becker DR, Rosenbaum JF, Herot C, Friedman D, Snidman N, … Faraone SV (2001). Further evidence of association between behavioral inhibition and social anxiety in children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(10), 1673–1679. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.10.1673 - DOI - PubMed