Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 29;14(5):1213-1215.
doi: 10.1111/eva.13196. eCollection 2021 May.

A continuum of genetic mixing for conservation management along the (mal)adaptation spectrum: A comment on Hoffmann et al

Erika Crispo  1 , Alison M Derry  2 , Steven P Brady  3
Affiliations

A continuum of genetic mixing for conservation management along the (mal)adaptation spectrum: A comment on Hoffmann et al

Erika Crispo et al. Evol Appl. .

Abstract

When restoring gene flow for conservation management, genetic variation should be viewed along a continuum of genetic divergence between donor and recipient populations. On the one hand, maintaining local adaptation (low divergence between donors and recipients) can enhance conservation success in the short term. On the other hand, reducing local adaptation in the short term by increasing genetic diversity (high divergence between some donors and recipients) might have better long-term success in the face of changing environmental conditions. Both Hoffman et al. (2020) and a paper we previously published in a Special Issue on Maladaptation in Applied Conservation (Derry et al., 2019) provide frameworks and syntheses for how best to apply conservation strategies in light of genetic variation and adaptation. A key difference between these two studies was that whereas Derry et al. (2019) performed a quantitative meta-analysis, Hoffman et al. (2020) relied on case studies and theoretical considerations, yielding slightly different conclusions. We here provide a summary of the two studies and contrast of the main similarities and differences between them, while highlighting terminology used to describe and explain main concepts.

Keywords: adaptation; conservation; evolutionary rescue; genetic rescue; genetic variation; maladaptation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Derry, A. M. , Fraser, D. J. , Brady, S. P. , Astorg, L. , Lawrence, E. R. , Martin, G. K. , Matte, J. M. , Negrín Dastis, J. O. , Paccard, A. , Barrett, R. , Chapman, L. J. , Lane, J. E. , Ballas, C. G. , Close, M. , & Crispo, E. (2019). Conservation through the lens of (mal)adaptation: Concepts and meta‐analysis. Evolutionary Applications, 12(7), 1287–1304. 10.1111/eva.12791 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellstrand, N. C. , & Elam, D. R. (1993). Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 24, 217–242. 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001245 - DOI
    1. Falconer, D. S. , & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th ed.). Longman.
    1. Frankham, R. , Ballou, J. D. , & Briscoe, D. A. (2010). Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press.
    1. Hoffmann, A. A. , Miller, A. D. , & Weeks, A. R. (2020). Genetic mixing for population management: From genetic rescue to provenancing. Evolutionary Applications, 14(3), 1–19. 10.1111/eva.13154 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources