Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons
- PMID: 34026323
- PMCID: PMC8128219
- DOI: 10.1080/21614083.2021.1918317
Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons
Abstract
To examine how to optimise the integration of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for learning in continuing professional development (CPD) events in surgery, we implemented and evaluated two methods in two subspecialities over multiple years. The same 12 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 66 facial trauma courses. Two different sets of 10 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 21 small animal fracture courses. We performed standard psychometric tests on responses from participants who completed both the pre- and post-event assessment. The average difficulty index pre-course was 57% with a discrimination index of 0.20 for small animal fractures and 53% with a discrimination index of 0.15 for facial trauma. For the majority of the individual MCQs, the scores were between 30%-70% and the discrimination index was >0.10. The difficulty index post-course increased in both groups (to 75% and 62%). The pre-course MCQs resulted in an average score in the expected range for both formats suggesting they were appropriate for the intended level of difficulty and an appropriate pre-course learning activity. Post-course completion resulted in increased scores with both formats. Both delivery methods worked well in all regions and overall quality depends on applying a solid item development and validation process.
Keywords: MCQ; assessment; cme; cpd; difficulty index; psychometric test; validation.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Monica Ghidinelli, Michael Cunningham, and Alain Rickli are employees of the AO Foundation. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the other author(s).
Figures
Similar articles
-
A comparison of clinical-scenario (case cluster) versus stand-alone multiple choice questions in a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate medicine.J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2016 Nov 11;12(1):14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.08.014. eCollection 2017 Feb. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 31435208 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of a One-Day Workshop on the Quality of Framing Multiple Choice Questions in Physiology in a Medical College in India.Cureus. 2023 Aug 24;15(8):e44049. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44049. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37746478 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.Cureus. 2023 Dec 13;15(12):e50441. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50441. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38222171 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.Natl Med J India. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):130-3. Natl Med J India. 2008. PMID: 19004145 Review.
-
Post-test questions.Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013 Sep;30(3):C1-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1354307. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013. PMID: 24436557 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Shumway JM, Harden RM.. Association for Medical Education in E. AMEE Guide No. 25: the assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician. Med Teach. 2003;25(6):569–11. - PubMed
-
- Tangianu F, Mazzone A, Berti F, et al. Are multiple-choice questions a good tool for the assessment of clinical competence in Internal Medicine? Ital J Aerosp Med. 1994;25(1–2):105–112.
-
- Bustraan J, Henny W, Kortbeek JB, et al. MCQ tests in Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS(c)): development and revision. Injury. 2016;47(3):665–668. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources