Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 7:8:615099.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.615099. eCollection 2021.

Review of Current COVID-19 Diagnostics and Opportunities for Further Development

Affiliations
Review

Review of Current COVID-19 Diagnostics and Opportunities for Further Development

Yan Mardian et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Diagnostic testing plays a critical role in addressing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Rapid and accurate diagnostic tests are imperative for identifying and managing infected individuals, contact tracing, epidemiologic characterization, and public health decision making. Laboratory testing may be performed based on symptomatic presentation or for screening of asymptomatic people. Confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection is typically by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), which requires specialized equipment and training and may be particularly challenging in resource-limited settings. NAAT may give false-negative results due to timing of sample collection relative to infection, improper sampling of respiratory specimens, inadequate preservation of samples, and technical limitations; false-positives may occur due to technical errors, particularly contamination during the manual real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) process. Thus, clinical presentation, contact history and contemporary phyloepidemiology must be considered when interpreting results. Several sample-to-answer platforms, including high-throughput systems and Point of Care (PoC) assays, have been developed to increase testing capacity and decrease technical errors. Alternatives to RT-PCR assay, such as other RNA detection methods and antigen tests may be appropriate for certain situations, such as resource-limited settings. While sequencing is important to monitor on-going evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, antibody assays are useful for epidemiologic purposes. The ever-expanding assortment of tests, with varying clinical utility, performance requirements, and limitations, merits comparative evaluation. We herein provide a comprehensive review of currently available COVID-19 diagnostics, exploring their pros and cons as well as appropriate indications. Strategies to further optimize safety, speed, and ease of SARS-CoV-2 testing without compromising accuracy are suggested. Access to scalable diagnostic tools and continued technologic advances, including machine learning and smartphone integration, will facilitate control of the current pandemic as well as preparedness for the next one.

Keywords: COVID-19; antigen test; clinical; diagnostics; in-vitro assay; molecular test; serologic test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
COVID-19 molecular testing. NAAT begins with RNA extraction followed by reverse transcription into complementary DNA (cDNA). The same cDNA can be used for conventional qPCR, RT-LAMP, which can also be coupled with CRISPR technology, and droplet digital PCR. PoC assays (uppermost right) use direct specimen and cartridge-based tests to produce rapid results. The PCR amplification product may be used to generate viral genome sequences (lowermost left). NAAT, nucleic acid amplification tests; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; PoC, point of care; LAMP, Loop-mediated isothermal amplification; CRISPR, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Image created in Biorender.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical and in vitro diagnostics for COVID-19. Clinical diagnostics consist of common clinical symptoms, imaging findings, and laboratory markers. In vitro diagnostics include molecular testing, antibody tests, and viral antigen detection. NAAT, nucleic acid amplification tests; PoC, point of care; CRISPR, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats; NAbs, neutralizing antibodies; PRNT, plaque reduction neutralization test; pVNT, pseudovirus-based virus neutralization test; sVNT, surrogate virus neutralization test; LFIA, lateral flow immunoassay; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; CLIA, chemiluminescent immunoassay; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; PT/INR, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; IL-6, interleukin 6; cTnI, cardiac troponin I; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CT, computed tomography; USG, ultrasound sonography. Image was created in Biorender.com.

References

    1. Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses . The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. (2020) 5:536–44. 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, et al. . A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. (2020) 579:265–9. 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu Z, Harrich D, Li Z, Hu D, Li D. The unique features of SARS-CoV-2 transmission: Comparison with SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus. Rev Med Virol. (2021) 31:e2171. 10.1002/rmv.2171 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rasmussen AL, Popescu S V. SARS-CoV-2 transmission without symptoms. Science. (2021) 371:1206LP−7. 10.1126/science.abf9569 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petrosillo N, Viceconte G, Ergonul O, Ippolito G, Petersen E. COVID-19, SARS and MERS : are they closely related? Clin Microbiol Infect. (2020) 26:729–34. 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.03.026 - DOI - PMC - PubMed