Math, magnets, and medicine: enabling personalized oncology

David A Hormuth 2nd^{1

2}, Angela M Jarrett^{1

2}, Guillermo Lorenzo^{1

3}, Ernesto A B F Lima^{1

4}, Chengyue Wu¹, Caroline Chung⁵, Debra Patt⁶, Thomas E Yankeelov^{1

2

5

7

8

9

10}

Affiliations

¹ Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
² Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
³ Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
⁴ Texas Advanced Computing Center, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
⁵ Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
⁶ Texas Oncology, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
⁷ Departments of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
⁸ Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
⁹ Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
¹⁰ Departments of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

PMID: 34027102
PMCID: PMC8133535
DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2021.1878023

Math, magnets, and medicine: enabling personalized oncology

David A Hormuth 2nd et al. Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2021.

. 2021;6(2):79-81.

doi: 10.1080/23808993.2021.1878023. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

Authors

David A Hormuth 2nd^{1

2}, Angela M Jarrett^{1

2}, Guillermo Lorenzo^{1

3}, Ernesto A B F Lima^{1

4}, Chengyue Wu¹, Caroline Chung⁵, Debra Patt⁶, Thomas E Yankeelov^{1

2

5

7

8

9

10}

Affiliations

¹ Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
² Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
³ Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
⁴ Texas Advanced Computing Center, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
⁵ Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
⁶ Texas Oncology, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
⁷ Departments of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
⁸ Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
⁹ Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
¹⁰ Departments of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

PMID: 34027102
PMCID: PMC8133535
DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2021.1878023

No abstract available

Keywords: Computational oncology; MRI; chemotherapy; optimal control theory; radiation therapy; treatment response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Cited by

Theranostic digital twins for personalized radiopharmaceutical therapies: Reimagining theranostics via computational nuclear oncology.
Rahmim A, Brosch-Lenz J, Fele-Paranj A, Yousefirizi F, Soltani M, Uribe C, Saboury B. Rahmim A, et al. Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 15;12:1062592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1062592. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36591527 Free PMC article.
MRI-Based Digital Models Forecast Patient-Specific Treatment Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Wu C, Jarrett AM, Zhou Z, Elshafeey N, Adrada BE, Candelaria RP, Mohamed RMM, Boge M, Huo L, White JB, Tripathy D, Valero V, Litton JK, Yam C, Son JB, Ma J, Rauch GM, Yankeelov TE. Wu C, et al. Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 16;82(18):3394-3404. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-1329. Cancer Res. 2022. PMID: 35914239 Free PMC article.
Building Digital Twins for Cardiovascular Health: From Principles to Clinical Impact.
Sel K, Osman D, Zare F, Masoumi Shahrbabak S, Brattain L, Hahn JO, Inan OT, Mukkamala R, Palmer J, Paydarfar D, Pettigrew RI, Quyyumi AA, Telfer B, Jafari R. Sel K, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct;13(19):e031981. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031981. Epub 2024 Aug 1. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39087582 Free PMC article. Review.
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Issues in Glioma Using Imaging Data: The Challenge of Numerical Twinning.
Guillevin R, Naudin M, Fayolle P, Giraud C, Le Guillou X, Thomas C, Herpe G, Miranville A, Fernandez-Maloigne C, Pellerin L, Guillevin C. Guillevin R, et al. J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 15;12(24):7706. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247706. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38137775 Free PMC article. Review.
Towards Patient-Specific Optimization of Neoadjuvant Treatment Protocols for Breast Cancer Based on Image-Guided Fluid Dynamics.
Wu C, Hormuth DA, Lorenzo G, Jarrett AM, Pineda F, Howard FM, Karczmar GS, Yankeelov TE. Wu C, et al. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022 Nov;69(11):3334-3344. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3168402. Epub 2022 Oct 19. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022. PMID: 35439121 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Björnsson B, Borrebaeck C, Elander N, Gasslander T, Gawel DR, Gustafsson M, Jörnsten R, Lee EJ, Li X, Lilja S, et al. 2019; Digital twins to personalize medicine. Genome Med. Genome Medicine; 12 1 10–3. - PMC - PubMed
1. Rockne RC, Hawkins-Daarud A, Swanson KR, Sluka JP, Glazier JA, Macklin P, Hormuth DA, Jarrett AM, Lima EABF, Tinsley Oden J, et al. 2019; The 2019 mathematical oncology roadmap. Phys Biol. IOP Publishing; 16 4 41005. - PMC - PubMed
2. ** Important survey of the mathematical oncology field identitifing areas for future development.
1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. 2011; Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation. Cell. 144 5 646–74. - PubMed
1. Atuegwu NC, Arlinghaus LR, Li X, Chakravarthy AB, Abramson VG, Sanders ME, Yankeelov TE. 2013; Parameterizing the Logistic Model of Tumor Growth by DW-MRI and DCE-MRI Data to Predict Treatment Response and Changes in Breast Cancer Cellularity during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Transl Oncol. 6 3 256–64. - PMC - PubMed
1. Weis JA, Miga MI, Arlinghaus LR, Li X, Chakravarthy AB, Abramson V, Farley J, Yankeelov TE. 2013; A mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model for predicting the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 58 17 5851–66. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Europe PubMed Central
- PubMed Central
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Math, magnets, and medicine: enabling personalized oncology

Affiliations

Math, magnets, and medicine: enabling personalized oncology

Authors

Affiliations

Conflict of interest statement

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources