Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 1;27(8):502-506.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001075.

Genome-Wide Association Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using the Michigan Genomics Initiative

Affiliations

Genome-Wide Association Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using the Michigan Genomics Initiative

Caroline K Cox et al. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to (1) replicate previously identified genetic variants significantly associated with pelvic organ prolapse and (2) identify new genetic variants associated with pelvic organ prolapse using a genome-wide association study.

Methods: Using our institution's database linking genetic and clinical data, we identified 1,329 women of European ancestry with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9)/ICD-10 code for prolapse, 767 of whom also had Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)/ICD-9/ICD-10 procedure codes for prolapse surgery, and 16,383 women of European ancestry older than 40 years without a prolapse diagnosis code as controls. Patients were genotyped using the Illumina HumanCoreExome chip and imputed to the Haplotype Reference Consortium. We tested 20 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for association with pelvic organ prolapse adjusting for relatedness, age, chip version, and 4 principal components. We compared our results with 18 previously identified genome-wide significant SNPs from the UK Biobank, Commun Biol (2020;3:129), and Obstet Gynecol (2011;118:1345-1353).

Results: No variants achieved genome-wide significance (P = 5 × 10-8). However, we replicated 4 SNPs with biologic plausibility at nominal significance (P ≤ 0.05): rs12325192 (P = 0.002), rs9306894 (P = 0.05), rs1920568 (P = 0.034), and rs1247943 (P = 0.041), which were all intergenic and nearest the genes SALL1, GDF7, TBX5, and TBX5, respectively.

Conclusions: Our replication of 4 biologically plausible previously reported SNPs provides further evidence for a genetic contribution to prolapse, specifically that rs12325192, rs9306894, rs1920568, and rs1247943 may contribute to susceptibility for prolapse. These and previously reported associations that have not yet been replicated should be further explored in larger, more diverse cohorts, perhaps through meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Manhattan Plot of GWAS Results
A: GWAS of all POP B: GWAS of surgery for POP Each dot represents an SNP. The y-axis shows negative log-base-10 of the p-value for each SNP when cases are tested against controls; the dotted line shows the threshold for genome-wide significance (p=5×10−8). GWAS=genome-wide association study SNP=single nucleotide polymorphism
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Replication of prior studies
*Replicated at nominal significance, MGI GWAS ~Replicated in MGI (surgical cases only GWAS) SNP=single nucleotide polymorphism Chr=chromosome REF=reference allele ALT=alternative allele AF=allele frequency MGI=Michigan Genomics Initiative GWAS=genome-wide association study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(2):277–285. - PubMed
    1. Dieter AA, Wilkins MF, Wu JM. Epidemiological trends and future care needs for pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(5):380–384. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lince SL, van Kempen LC, Vierhout ME, et al. A systematic review of clinical studies on hereditary factors in pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(10):1327–1336. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Altman D, Forsman M, Falconer C, et al. Genetic influence on stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Eur Urol. 2008;54(4):918–922. - PubMed
    1. Allen-Brady K, Norton PA, Hill AJ, et al. Risk of pelvic organ prolapse treatment based on extended family history. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(1):105 e101–105 e108. - PubMed

Publication types