Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep;128(3):271-279.
doi: 10.1111/bju.15495. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

The cancer multidisciplinary team meeting: in need of change? History, challenges and future perspectives

Affiliations
Review

The cancer multidisciplinary team meeting: in need of change? History, challenges and future perspectives

David A Winters et al. BJU Int. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Two decades since their inception, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are widely regarded as the 'gold standard' of cancer care delivery. Benefits of MDT working include improved patient outcomes, adherence to guidelines, and even economic benefits. Benefits to MDT members have also been demonstrated. An increasing body of evidence supports the use of MDTs and provides guidance on best practise. The system of MDTs in cancer care has come under increasing pressure of late, due to the increasing incidence of cancer, the popularity of MDT working, and financial pressures. This pressure has resulted in recommendations by national bodies to implement streamlining to reduce workload and improve efficiency. In the present review we examine the historical evidence for MDT working, and the scientific developments that dictate best practise. We also explore how streamlining can be safely and effectively undertaken. Finally, we discuss the future of MDT working including the integration of artificial intelligence and decision support systems and propose a new model for improving patient centredness.

Keywords: assessment; complexity; decision-making; multidisciplinary teams; observation; optimisation; quality improvement; streamlining.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer Institute New South Wales. NSW cancer plan 2016 [Internet]. Cancer.nsw.gov.au, 2016. Available at: https://www.cancer.nsw.gov.au/getmedia/69ca5241-3620-4898-a32b-e7c7e78ca.... Accessed February 2021
    1. Independent Cancer Task Force. Achieving world-class cancer outcomes: a strategy for England 2015-2020 [Internet]. England.nhs.uk, 2020. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/national-cancertra.... Accessed February 2021
    1. Soukup T, Petrides K, Lamb BW et al. The anatomy of clinical decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer meetings: a cross-sectional observational study of teams in a natural context. Medicine 2016; 95: e3885
    1. Lamb B, Brown K, Nagpal K, Vincent C, Green J, Sevdalis N. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 2116-25
    1. Kesson EM, Allardice GM, George WD, Burns HJG, Morrison DS. Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women. BMJ 2012; 344: e2718

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources