Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;69(1):30-36.
doi: 10.1002/jmrs.486. Epub 2021 May 24.

The influence of breast density and key demographics of radiographers on mammography reporting performance - a pilot study

Maram Alakhras  1 , Dana S Al-Mousa  1 , Alaa K Alqadi  1 , Haneen A Sabaneh  1 , Ruba M Karasneh  1 , Kelly M Spuur  2
Affiliations

The influence of breast density and key demographics of radiographers on mammography reporting performance - a pilot study

Maram Alakhras et al. J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: A high demand has been placed on radiologists to perform screen reads due to higher number of women undergoing mammography. This study aims to examine radiographer performance in reporting low compared with high-mammographic density (MD) images; and to assess the influence of key demographics of Jordanian radiographers on their performance.

Methods: Thirty mammograms with varied MD were reported by 12 radiographers using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Radiographer performance was measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC). Performance measures were compared between cases with low- and high-MD and between subgroups of radiographers according to key demographics.

Results: All performance measures were significantly higher in low- compared to high-MD cases (P value < 0.0). The mean sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and ROC AUC were 0.58, 0.68, 0.67, 0.63 and 0.69 respectively. PPV was significantly different for readers who had different years of experience in mammography, hours and cases per week P value = 0.023, 0.01, 0.017 respectively. ROC AUC was significantly different for radiographers with different number of hours and cases performed per week (P value = 0.001 and 0.004 respectively).

Conclusions: The results of this pilot study are encouraging however a more extensive study is required to determine if Jordanian radiographers are capable of successfully taking part in breast screen reading. The lack of skills and knowledge required for correct and consistent reporting of high-MD images highlights the need for any formal training in mammographic interpretation to focus on the dense breast.

Keywords: Breast; mammography; reporting; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Holt JJ, Pollard K. Radiographers’ ability to perceive and classify abnormalities on mammographic images — results of a pilot project. Radiographers 2010; 57: 8–14.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, BreastScreen Australia, Australia (eds). BreastScreen Australia: achievement report 1997 and 1998. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2000.
    1. Houn F, Brown ML. Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities. Radiology 1994; 190: 209–15. - PubMed
    1. UK National Health Service Breast Screening Web site. The NHS Breast Screening Programme. Available at: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen. Accessibility verified September 10, 2003.
    1. Andersson I, Janzon L. Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö mammographic screening program. JNCI Monogr 1997; 1997: 63–7. - PubMed