Richard Cabot, pair-matched random allocation, and the attempt to compare like with like in the social sciences and medicine. Part 2: the context of medicine and public health
- PMID: 34028295
- PMCID: PMC8150561
- DOI: 10.1177/01410768211003790
Richard Cabot, pair-matched random allocation, and the attempt to compare like with like in the social sciences and medicine. Part 2: the context of medicine and public health
References
-
- Chalmers I, Dukan E, Podolsky SH, Smith GD. The advent of fair treatment allocation schedules in clinical trials during the 19th and early 20th centuries. J R Soc Med 2012; 105: 221–227. See https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/articles/the-advent-of-fair-treatment-a.../ (last checked 25 February 2021. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chalmers I. Statistical theory was not the reason that randomisation was used in the British Medical Research Council’s clinical trial of streptomycin for pulmonary tuberculosis. In: Jorland G, Opinel A, Weisz G, eds. Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and Sociological Perspectives. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2005: 309–334.
-
- Bothwell LE, Podolsky SH. The emergence of the randomized, controlled trial. N Eng J Med 2016; 375: 501–504. - PubMed
-
- Lind J. A Treatise of the Scurvy. In Three Parts. Containing an Inquiry into the Nature, Causes, and Cure, of that Disease. Together with a Critical and Chronological View of what has been Published on the Subject. Edinburgh: Sands, Murray, and Cochran for A. Kincaid and A. Donaldson, 1753.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
