Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 24;11(1):10800.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90254-y.

A validated model for predicting live birth after embryo transfer

Affiliations

A validated model for predicting live birth after embryo transfer

Michael S Awadalla et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Accurately predicting the probability of live birth and multiple gestations is important for determining a safe number of embryos to transfer after in vitro fertilization. We developed a model that can be fit to individual clinic data for predicting singleton, twin, and total live birth rates after human embryo transfer. The predicted and observed rates of singleton and twin deliveries were compared in a tenfold cross-validation study using data from a single clinic. The model presented accounts for patient age, embryo stage (cleavage or blastocyst), type of transfer cycle (fresh or frozen) and uterine/universal factors. The standardized errors for rates of singleton and twin deliveries were normally distributed and the mean errors were not significantly different from zero (all p > 0.05). The live birth rates per embryo varied from as high as 43% for fresh blastocysts in the 35-year-old age group to as low as 1% for frozen cleavage stage embryos in the 43-year-old age group. This quantitative model or a simplified version can be used for clinics to generate and analyze their own data to guide the number of embryos to transfer to limit the risk of multiple gestations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Embryo transfer cycles included and excluded.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Embryo transfer models demonstrated for transfer of two embryos. (a) Demonstrates logic for independent embryo implantation and (b) demonstrates logic for independent embryo implantation only when universal factors are favorable. The universal factors fraction is a fraction from 0 (never favorable) to 1 (always favorable). The probability of each outcome is equal to the product of the terms next to the corresponding arrows above and the corresponding terms on the perimeter of the square. For example, the predicted probability of twins in panel b is UNI × LBRe1UNI × LBRe2UNI. This same logic can be applied to transfer of more than two embryos. UNI, universal factors fraction; LBRe1, live birth rate for embryo 1; LBRe2, live birth rate for embryo 2. This figure is being reproduced from a previous publication.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Live Birth Rate per Embryo for (a) Blastocyst and (b) Cleavage Stage Embryos. 5-year moving groups are used to calculate live birth rates for ages 35 to 43.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Predicted outcomes for (a) Fresh Blastocyst, (b) Fresh Cleavage Stage, (c) Frozen Blastocyst, and (d) Frozen Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfers. The multiples column results are shaded green, yellow, red, or gray to indicate the risk of multiples at delivery (0–9%, 10–19%, 20–29%, or ≥ 30% respectively). LBR, total live birth rate per embryo transfer; % mult., percentage of live deliveries that are multiples; % twins, percentage of live deliveries that are twin deliveries; % trip. or > , percentage of live deliveries that are triplets or greater.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2016 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report. Atlanta (GA): US Dept of Health and Human Services. 5–18 (2018).
    1. Pfeifer S, et al. Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: An American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 2012;97:825–834. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.048. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Penzias A, et al. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 2017;107:901–903. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.107. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Speirs AL, Lopata A, Gronow MJ, Kellow GN, Johnston WI. Analysis of the benefits and risks of multiple embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 1983;39:468–471. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46933-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA. Factors affecting embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: A hypothesis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990;163:2020–2023. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90790-E. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources