Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 May 24;11(1):10762.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90262-y.

Facilitation of oral sensitivity by electrical stimulation of the faucial pillars

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Facilitation of oral sensitivity by electrical stimulation of the faucial pillars

Tobias Braun et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Dysphagia is common in neurological disease. However, our understanding of swallowing and its central nervous control is limited. Sensory information plays a vital role in the initiation of the swallowing reflex and is often reduced in stroke patients. We hypothesized that the sensitivity threshold of the anterior faucial pillar could be facilitated by either electrical stimulation (ES) or taste and smell information. The sensitivity threshold was measured by ES in the anterior faucial pillar region. The measurement was repeated 5 min after baseline. Thirty minutes after baseline, the participants underwent a test for taste and smell. Immediately after the test, the ES was repeated. Thirty healthy volunteers with a mean age of 27 ± 5.1 participated in the trial. Mean sensitivity threshold at baseline was 1.9 ± 0.59 mA. The values 5 min after baseline (1.74 ± 0.56 mA, p = 0.027) and 30 min after baseline (1.67 ± 0.58 mA, p = 0.011) were significantly lower compared to the baseline, but there was no difference between the latter (p = 0.321). After 5 min, a potentially facilitating effect was found on oral sensitivity by ES of the faucial pillar area. Thirty minutes later, this effect was still present.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03240965. Registered 7th August 2017- https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03240965 .

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurements of sensitivity threshold presented as mean and standard deviation. The values 5 min after baseline (1.74 ± 0.56 mA, p = 0.027, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.081) and 30 min after baseline (1.67 ± 0.58 mA; p = 0.011, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.033) are significantly lower compared to baseline, but there is no difference between 5 and 30 min after baseline (p = 0.321, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.963).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Workflow of the experiment.

References

    1. Arnold M, Liesirova K, Broeg-Morvay A, et al. Dysphagia in acute stroke: incidence, burden and impact on clinical outcome. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148424. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warnecke T, Ritter MA, Kroger B, et al. Fiberoptic endoscopic Dysphagia severity scale predicts outcome after acute stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2009;28(3):283–289. doi: 10.1159/000228711. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smithard DG, Smeeton NC, Wolfe CDA. Long-term outcome after stroke: does dysphagia matter? Age Ageing. 2007;36(1):90–94. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl149. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, et al. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36(12):2756–2763. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000190056.76543.eb. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heuschmann PU, Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Misselwitz B, et al. Predictors of in-hospital mortality and attributable risks of death after ischemic stroke: the German Stroke Registers Study Group. Arch. Intern. Med. 2004;164(16):1761–1768. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.16.1761. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources