Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;10(10):1419-1432.
doi: 10.1002/sctm.20-0424. Epub 2021 May 25.

Type II collagen-positive embryonic progenitors are the major contributors to spine and intervertebral disc development and repair

Affiliations

Type II collagen-positive embryonic progenitors are the major contributors to spine and intervertebral disc development and repair

Xinhua Li et al. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Basic mechanism of spine development is poorly understood. Type II collagen positive (Col2+) cells have been reported to encompass early mesenchymal progenitors that continue to become chondrocytes, osteoblasts, stromal cells, and adipocytes in long bone. However, the function of Col2+ cells in spine and intervertebral disc (IVD) development is largely unknown. To further elucidate the function of Col2+ progenitors in spine, we generated the mice with ablation of Col2+ cells either at embryonic or at postnatal stage. Embryonic ablation of Col2+ progenitors caused the mouse die at newborn with the absence of all spine and IVD. Moreover, postnatal deletion Col2+ cells in spine resulted in a shorter growth plate and endplate cartilage, defected inner annulus fibrosus, a less compact and markedly decreased gel-like matrix in the nucleus pulposus and disorganized cell alignment in each compartment of IVD. Genetic lineage tracing IVD cell populations by using inducible Col2-creERT;tdTomato reporter mice and non-inducible Col2-cre;tdTomato reporter mice revealed that the numbers and differentiation ability of Col2+ progenitors decreased with age. Moreover, immunofluorescence staining showed type II collagen expression changed from extracellular matrix to cytoplasm in nucleus pulposus between 6 month and 1-year-old mice. Finally, fate-mapping studies revealed that Col2+ progenitors are essential for IVD repair in IVD injured model. In summary, embryonic Col2+ cells are the major source of spine development and Col2+ progenitors are the important contributors for IVD repair and regeneration.

Keywords: intervertebral disc; lineage-tracing; nucleus pulposus; stem cell; type II collagen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Ablation of embryonic Col2+ progenitors in mice causes absence of the spine. A, Gross appearance of Col2‐cre, and Col2‐cre;DTAfl/− mice at P0. B, X‐ray images for P0 Col2‐cre, and Col2‐cre;DTAfl/− mice. Yellow arrow: spine is completely absent in mutant newborn compared to Col2‐cre control. C, Alizarin red and Alcian blue staining of newborn Col2‐cre and Col2‐cre;DTAfl/− mouse. Yellow arrow: spine complete loss in mutant newborn. Scale bar = 1 mm. D, The tail of Col2‐cre and Col2‐cre;DTAfl/− newborns mice stained by Goldner's trichrome. Scale bar = 300 μm. E,F, Higher magnification of Golden staining in tail vertebra and skin. Yellow arrow: vertebral and intervertebral disc (IVD) complete loss in mutant newborn. Six mice evaluated in each group. Scale bar = 100 μm
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Postnatal deletion of Col2+ cells disrupt the pattern of spine. A, X‐ray of spine in 4‐week‐old Col2‐creERT and Col2‐creERT;DTAfl/fl mice. Scale bar = 1 mm. B, The quantity analysis of mice L3‐L5 length of (A) (n = 6 mice per condition from three independent experiments). Data are mean ± SD. C, Alizarin red and Alcian blue staining for the tail from the 4‐week‐old Col2‐creERT and Col2‐creERT;DTAfl/fl mice. Scale bar = 500 μm. D, Safranin O/fast green staining of coronal sections of L4‐5 spine in 4‐week‐old Col2‐creERT and Col2‐creERT;DTAfl/fl mice. Scale bar = 200 μm. E‐H, High magnification pictures showing growth plate (GP), AF, and NP in 4‐week‐old Col2‐creERT and Col2‐creERT;DTAfl/fl mice. Scale bar = 20 μm. I, Immunofluorescence staining for Col2α1 in intervertebral disc (IVD) of 4‐week‐old Col2‐creERT and Col2‐creERT;DTAfl/fl mice. Scale bar = 50 μm. J‐L, High magnification immunofluorescence pictures showing Col2α1 protein expression in NP, AF, and GP from 4‐week‐old Col2‐creERT and Col2‐creERT;DTAfl/fl mice. M,N, Phalloidin staining show the cytoskeleton of NP and AF in 4‐week‐old Col2‐creERT and Col2‐creERT;DTAfl/fl mice. Statistical significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA and Student's t test. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .0001. NS, not statistically significant. Scale bar = 20 μm
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Spatial distribution of embryonic and postnatal Col2+ cells in the mouse intervertebral disc (IVD) and vertebral bone. A, Representative images from lineage tracing of embryonic Col2+ cells in IVD at different time point (P0, P6, P14, P30, P90, P187, and P365) in Col2‐cre;tdTomato mice. Six mice evaluated in each group. B, Representative images from lineage tracing of Col2 + cells in IVD at different time point (P6, P8, P14, P30, P90, P187, and P365) in Col2‐creERT;tdTomato mice. Tamoxifen (75 mg TM/kg body weight) were i.p. injected into P3 mice. Six mice evaluated in each group. C, Representative images from lineage tracing tdTomato+ cells in IVD from Col2‐creERT;tdTomato and Aggrecan‐creERT;tdTomato mice at P30. Tamoxifen (75 mg TM/kg body weight) were i.p. injected into P3 mice. Six mice evaluated in each group. Scale bar = 200 μm
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Lineage tracing Col2+ cells in spine and intervertebral disc (IVD) at different time points. A, Lineage tracing Col2+ cells in spine and IVD at P0, P6, P14, P30, and P90 in Col2‐cre;tdTomato mice. (Since all the Col2+ cells activated from embryonic stage Col2‐cre;tdTomato mice, we only include the date for harvesting mice sample in each group. For example, P6 means: in Col2‐cre;tdTomato mice, the date for harvest is P6.) B, Quantitative measurements of the percentage of tdTomato+ cells to the total DAPI+ cells in (A) (n = 6 mice per condition from three independent experiments). Data are mean ± SD. C, Lineage tracing Col2+ cells in spine and IVD at P6, P14, P30, and P90 in Col2‐creERT;tdTomato mice. Tamoxifen (75 mg TM/kg body weight) were i.p. injected into P3 mice. Six mice evaluated in each group. (The data presented: harvest time (tamoxifen injected date + the tracing time.) For example, P6 (3 + 3) means: in Col2‐creERT;tdTomato mice, the date for harvest is P6 (TM injected date is P3 and tracing for 3 days). D, Quantitative measurements of the percentage of tdTomato+ cells to the total DAPI+ cells in (C) (n = 6 mice per condition from three independent experiments). Data are mean ± SD. Statistical significance determined by one‐way ANOVA and Student's t test. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .0001. NS, not statistically significant. Scale bar = 500 μm
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
The decreased numbers and differentiation ability of Col2+ progenitors during aging. A, Lineage tracing of postnatal Col2+ cells for 3 days in each component of intervertebral disc (IVD) which activated at different time points (P3, P21, P27, P87, P184, and P362). 75 mg/kg tamoxifen were i.p. injected into mice at above indicated different time points. The mice were harvested at day 3 following TM injection. B, Lineage tracing of Col2+ cells in IVD at P90, which was activated at different time points (since embryo, P3, P30, P60, and P87). C, Lineage tracing Col2+ cells in IVD for 1 month while activated at different time point (since embryo, P3, P60). 75 mg/kg tamoxifen were i.p. injected into mice at above indicated different points. D, Quantitative measurements of the percentage of tdTomato+ cells to the total DAPI+ cells in (A) (n = 6 mice per condition from three independent experiments). Data are mean ± SD. E, Quantitative measurements of the percentage of tdTomato+ cells to the total DAPI+ cells in (B) (n = 6 mice per condition from three independent experiments). Data are mean ± SD. F, Quantitative measurements of the percentage of the cells with tdTomato+ to the total DAPI+ cells per view of (C) (n = 6 mice per condition from three independent experiments). Data are mean ± SD. The percentage calculation in each tissue were measured at least 1000 cells each sample. Statistical significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA and Student's t test. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .0001. NS, not statistically significant. Scale bar = 200 μm
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
The inconsistence of Col2+ cells and type II collagen expression in mice intervertebral disc (IVD). A‐D, The expression Col2+ cells by lineage tracing of Col2‐creERT;tdTomato, Col2‐cre;tdTomato mice, and Col2α1 expression examined by IF staining in IVD at P6 (A), P30 (B), P187 (C), and P365 (D). Six mice were evaluated in each group. Scale bar = 200 μm
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Col2+ progenitors are important for intervertebral disc (IVD) repair. A, The illustration of the experiment design. B, Representative of X‐ray images in Col2‐creERT;tdTomato and Col2‐creERT;DTAfl/fl mice. Yellow arrow: the injured IVD in each group. Scale bar = 5 mm. C, Measurement protocol for the determination of the DHI calculated as [(d + e + f)/(a + b + c + g + h + i) ×100%]. D, DHI at different time‐points following injury. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10). DHI, disc height index (n = 6 mice per condition from three independent experiments). Data are mean ± SD. E, Representative fluorescent images of coronal sections of IVD in intact Col2‐creERT;tdTomato, injured Col2‐creERT;tdTomato, and Col2‐creERT;DTAfl/fl;tdTomato mice. Scale bar = 20 μm. F, Representative H&E images of coronal sections of IVD in intact Col2‐creERT, injured Col2‐creERT and Col2‐creERT;DTAfl/fl mice. Scale bar = 20 μm. G, CFU‐F assay in Col2+ IAF progenitor. Scale bar = 20 μm. H, Trilineage differentiation of Col2+ progenitors. Osteogenic (left), chondrogenic (center), and adipogenic (right) differentiation conditions. Statistical significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA and Student's t test. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .0001. NS, not statistically significant. Scale bar = 10 μm

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kaplan KM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA. Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities. Spine J. 2005;5(5):564‐576. - PubMed
    1. Grimme JD, Castillo M. Congenital anomalies of the spine. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2007;17(1):1‐16. - PubMed
    1. Chen S, Feng J, Zhang H, Jia M, Shen Y, Zong Z. Key role for the transcriptional factor, osterix, in spine development. Spine J. 2014;14(4):683‐694. - PubMed
    1. Fleming A, Kishida MG, Kimmel CB, Keynes RJ. Building the backbone: the development and evolution of vertebral patterning. Development. 2015;142(10):1733‐1744. - PubMed
    1. Scaal M. Early development of the vertebral column. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;49:83‐91. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances