Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 8;6(13):e149271.
doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.149271.

Placental mTOR complex 1 regulates fetal programming of obesity and insulin resistance in mice

Affiliations

Placental mTOR complex 1 regulates fetal programming of obesity and insulin resistance in mice

Brian Akhaphong et al. JCI Insight. .

Abstract

Fetal growth restriction, or low birth weight, is a strong determinant for eventual obesity and type 2 diabetes. Clinical studies suggest placental mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling regulates fetal birth weight and the metabolic health trajectory of the offspring. In the current study, we used a genetic model with loss of placental mTOR function (mTOR-KOPlacenta) to test the direct role of mTOR signaling on birth weight and metabolic health in the adult offspring. mTOR-KOPlacenta animals displayed reduced placental area and total weight, as well as fetal body weight at embryonic day (E) 17.5. Birth weight and serum insulin levels were reduced; however, β cell mass was normal in mTOR-KOPlacenta newborns. Adult mTOR-KOPlacenta offspring, under a metabolic high-fat challenge, displayed exacerbated obesity and metabolic dysfunction compared with littermate controls. Subsequently, we tested whether enhancing placental mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling, via genetic ablation of TSC2, in utero would improve glucose homeostasis in the offspring. Indeed, increased placental mTORC1 conferred protection from diet-induced obesity in the offspring. In conclusion, placental mTORC1 serves as a mechanistic link between placental function and programming of obesity and insulin resistance in the adult offspring.

Keywords: Diabetes; Endocrinology; Islet cells; Metabolism; Obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Reduced placental weight and fetal body weight in mTOR-KOPlacenta embryos.
Schematic diagram and timeline of the mTOR-KO study (A). Endogenous GFP reporter (CAG-ZsGreen1) in control (CYP19Cre), positive control (CYP19Cre+) experimental placentas (B). Representative Western blot of E15.5 placenta lysates for mTOR and phosphorylated S6 (Ser 240) and respective quantifications normalized to vinculin (C). H&E staining of control (Ctrl) and mTOR-KOPlacenta (D, junctional zone [JZ] and labyrinth zone [LZ]). Placental weight of E17.5 males (n = 25 Ctrl, 16 mTOR-KOPlacenta) and females (n = 24 Ctrl, 18 mTOR-KOPlacenta, E). E17.5 fetal weight separated by male (n = 25 Ctrl, 16 mTOR-KOPlacenta) and female (n = 23 Ctrl, 18 mTOR-KOPlacenta, F). P0 (within 12 hours of birth) body weight separated by male (n = 13 Ctrl, 5 mTOR-HETPlacenta, 11 mTOR-KOPlacenta) and female (n = 10 Ctrl, 4 mTOR-HETPlacenta, 5 mTOR-KOPlacenta, G). Random blood glucose was measured from trunk blood of P0 males (n = 13 Ctrl, 5 mTOR-HETPlacenta, 10 mTOR-KOPlacenta) and females (n = 10 Ctrl, 4 mTOR-HETPlacenta, 5 mTOR-KOPlacenta, H). Random insulin serum was measured from trunk blood of P0 Ctrl, mTOR-HETPlacenta, and mTOR-KOPlacenta pups (n = 25, 13, 10, respectively) from 5 dams (I). Random insulin serum was measured from trunk blood of P0 Ctrl, mTOR-HETPlacenta, and mTOR-KOPlacenta males (n = 17, 6, 10, respectively) and females (n = 10, 7, 9, respectively) from 5 dams (J). Fetal 3H-Leucine uptake after 10 minutes of leucine placental perfusion in utero (n = 4–6) from 3 dams (K). Statistical analysis was performed using 2-tailed Mann-Whitney (C, I, and K) and 2-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons (EG, H, and J). Error bars represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 Ctrl vs. mTOR-KOPlacenta. Scale bars in images (B and D) are 200 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2. mTOR-KOPlacenta females become obese, glucose intolerant, and insulin resistant after HFD treatment.
Weight of Ctrl versus mTOR-KOPlacenta over 90 days of HFD starting at 17 weeks of age (n = 6, 7, respectively; A). EchoMRI body composition measurements after 11 weeks of HFD (n = 6, 7, B) and body fat percentage (C). Food consumed per gram body weight over 48 hours (n = 4, 6, D). VO2 of Ctrl versus mTOR-KOPlacenta at 11 weeks of HFD (n = 6, E). VCO2, RER, and energy expenditure (n = 6, FH). Random blood glucose of HFD (n = 6, 7, I). Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) after 16 hours of fasting on HFD at 6 weeks (n = 6, 7, J). Insulin tolerance test (ITT) after 6 hours of fasting at 8 weeks of HFD (n = 6, 7, K). ITT after 6 hours of fasting at 12 weeks of HFD (n = 6, 7, L). Random serum insulin at 10 weeks of HFD (n = 6, 7, M). β Cell mass at 13 weeks of HFD (n = 4 each group, N). In vivo GSIS and secretory ratio at 10 weeks of HFD (n = 4 Ctrl, 5 mTOR-KOPlacenta, O and P). In vivo GSIS on NCD, 12 weeks old (n = 8 each group, Q). In vitro GSIS on normal chow, 12 weeks old (n = 5 each group, R), and islet insulin content (n = 5 each group, S). β Cell mass at 12 weeks old (n = 3 Ctrl, 3 mTOR-KOPlacenta, T). Random insulin serum of normal chow at 70 weeks old (n = 4 each group, U). In vivo and in vitro GSIS of normal chow 70-week-old mice (n = 4 each group, V and W). Islet insulin content of normal chow 70-week-old mice (n = 4 each group, X). LG, low glucose; HG, high glucose. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-tailed Mann-Whitney (C, D, M, N, P, SU, and X) and 2-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparisons (A, B, EL, O, Q, R, V, and W) with repeated measures when appropriate. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, Ctrl vs. mTOR-KOPlacenta. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 vs. time point 0 or LG (within genotype).
Figure 3
Figure 3. TSC2-KOPlacenta newborn offspring have normal placental weight and β cell mass.
Schematic diagram and timeline of the TSC2-KO study (A). H&E staining of E17.5 Ctrl and TSC2-KOPlacenta (B). Placental weights of male Ctrl versus TSC2-KOPlacenta (n = 7, 6) and female Ctrl versus TSC2-KOPlacenta (n = 7, 8) mice at E17.5 (C). Fetal weights of male (nE17.5 = 8, 5; nP0 = 10, 6) and female (nE17.5 = 7, 8; nP0 = 6, 9) Ctrl vs. TSC2-KOPlacenta mice at E17.5 and P0 (D). Pancreas weights of male (nE17.5 = 8, 5; nP0 = 8, 6) and female (nE17.5 = 7, 8; nP0 = 6, 9) mice measured at E17.5 and P0 (E). Random blood glucose of males (n = 8, 6) and females (n = 6, 9) at P0 (F). Random serum insulin of males (n = 4, 6) and females (n = 4, 6) at P0 (G). β Cell mass of males (n = 4 Ctrl, 2 TSC2-HETPlacenta, 3 TSC2-KOPlacenta) and females at P0 (n = 7 Ctrl, 4 TSC2-HETPlacenta, 5 TSC2-KOPlacenta, H). Whole pancreatic insulin content of males (n = 4 Ctrl, 6 TSC2-KOPlacenta) and females (n = 5 Ctrl, 6 TSC2-KOPlacenta) at P0 (I). Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons (CI). Error bars represent mean ± SEM. Scale bars in images are 500 μm. *P < 0.05 Ctrl vs. TSC2-KOPlacenta.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Adult male TSC2-KOPlacenta mice are protected from obesity-induced metabolic dysfunction.
Weight progression of Ctrl versus TSC2-KOPlacenta male mice fed with HFD over 9 weeks starting at 17 weeks of age (n = 4, 5, respectively, A). Food intake measurements of HFD male mice (n = 4, 5, B). Random blood glucose of HFD male mice (n = 4, 5, C). IPGTT after 16 hours of fasting at 2 weeks HFD (n = 4, 5, D) and corresponding random and fasting blood glucose (n = 4, 5, E). IPGTT after 16 hours of fasting at 4 weeks of HFD (n = 4, 5, F) in addition to random and fasting blood glucose (n = 4, 5, G). ITT at 5 weeks of HFD after 6 hours of fasting (n = 4, 5, H). HOMA-IR of HFD males at 6 weeks (n = 4, 5, I). Random insulin serum levels at 1 and 4 weeks of HFD (n = 4, 4–5, J). In vivo GSIS on males at 6 weeks of HFD (n = 4, 5, K) and concurrent IPGTT (n = 4, 5, L). β Cell mass of males at 10 weeks of HFD (n = 4, 5, M). Statistical analysis was performed using 2-tailed Mann-Whitney (I and M) and 2-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons (AH and JL) with repeated measures when appropriate. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 Ctrl vs. TSC2-KOPlacenta. ##P < 0.01 vs. time point 0 (within genotype).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Adult female TSC2-KOPlacenta offspring are protected from obesity-induced metabolic dysfunction.
Weight progression of female mice fed with HFD over the course of 12 weeks starting at 8 weeks old (n = 6 Ctrl, 4 TSC2-KOPlacenta, A). Random blood glucose of HFD females over the duration of treatment (n = 6, 4, B). Female IPGTT after 16-hour fast at 6 weeks of HFD (n = 6, 4, C). Female ITT after 6-hour fast at 8 weeks of HFD (n = 6, 4, D). Blood glucose and insulin serum measurements at random and fasting times of 8-week HFD females (n = 6, 4, E; n = 5, 3, F). HOMA-IR of HFD females at 8 weeks (n = 5, 3, G). Pancreas weight (n = 6, 4, H) and β cell mass (n = 6, 4, I) of females at 12 weeks of HFD. In vivo GSIS of aged Ctrl versus TSC2-KOPlacenta females under normal diet (n = 3, 5, J). In vitro GSIS of 12-week-old female islets under low glucose, high glucose, high glucose plus palmitate, and KCl stimulation (n = 7, 6, K). Insulin content normalized to DNA (n = 7, 6, L). β Cell mass of female Ctrl versus TSC2-KOPlacenta under normal chow (n = 3, 4, M). Statistical analysis was performed using 2-tailed Mann-Whitney (GI, L, and M) and 2-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons in (AF, J, and K) with repeated measures when appropriate. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 Ctrl vs. TSC2-KOPlacenta. #P < 0.05 vs. time point 0 or LG (within genotype).

References

    1. Danaei G, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):31–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lango H, et al. Assessing the combined impact of 18 common genetic variants of modest effect sizes on type 2 diabetes risk. Diabetes. 2008;57(11):3129–3135. doi: 10.2337/db08-0504. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morris AP, et al. Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2012;44(9):981–990. doi: 10.1038/ng.2383. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alejandro EU, et al. Maternal diet-induced microRNAs and mTOR underlie beta cell dysfunction in offspring. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(10):4395–4410. doi: 10.1172/JCI74237. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sandovici I, et al. Developmental and environmental epigenetic programming of the endocrine pancreas: consequences for type 2 diabetes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(9):1575–1595. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1297-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types