Lack of Consensus Across Clinical Guidelines Regarding the Role of Psychosocial Factors Within Low Back Pain Care: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 34033963
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.04.013
Lack of Consensus Across Clinical Guidelines Regarding the Role of Psychosocial Factors Within Low Back Pain Care: A Systematic Review
Abstract
It is widely accepted that psychosocial prognostic factors should be addressed by clinicians in their assessment and management of patient suffering from low back pain (LBP). On the other hand, an overview is missing how these factors are addressed in clinical LBP guidelines. Therefore, our objective was to summarize and compare recommendations regarding the assessment and management of psychosocial prognostic factors for LBP chronicity, as reported in clinical LBP guidelines. We performed a systematic search of clinical LBP guidelines (PROSPERO registration number 154730). This search consisted of a combination of previously published systematic review articles and a new systematic search in medical or guideline-related databases. From the included guidelines, we extracted recommendations regarding the assessment and management of LBP which addressed psychosocial prognostic factors (ie, psychological factors ["yellow flags"], perceptions about the relationship between work and health, ["blue flags"], system or contextual obstacles ["black flags") and psychiatric symptoms ["orange flags"]). In addition, we evaluated the level or quality of evidence of these recommendations. In total, we included 15 guidelines. Psychosocial prognostic factors were addressed in 13 of 15 guidelines regarding their assessment and in 14 of 15 guidelines regarding their management. Recommendations addressing psychosocial factors almost exclusively concerned "yellow" or "black flags," and varied widely across guidelines. The supporting evidence was generally of very low quality. We conclude that in general, clinical LBP guidelines do not provide clinicians with clear instructions about how to incorporate psychosocial factors in LBP care and should be optimized in this respect. More specifically, clinical guidelines vary widely in whether and how they address psychosocial factors, and recommendations regarding these factors generally require better evidence support. This emphasizes a need for a stronger evidence-base underlying the role of psychosocial risk factors within LBP care, and a need for uniformity in methodology and terminology across guidelines. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review summarized clinical guidelines on low back pain (LBP) on how they addressed the identification and management of psychosocial factors. This review revealed a large amount of variety across guidelines in whether and how psychosocial factors were addressed. Moreover, recommendations generally lacked details and were based on low quality evidence.
Keywords: Low back pain; guidelines; prognostic; psychosocial; work; yellow flags.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Concordance of Patient Expectations Regarding Guideline Recommendations for Management of Psychosocial Factors in Low Back Pain: A Cross-sectional Study.Pain Physician. 2022 Jul;25(4):E597-E607. Pain Physician. 2022. PMID: 35793184
-
Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications.Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 May-Jun;15(3):190-9. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552011000300004. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011. PMID: 21829982 Review.
-
Exploring general practitioner identification and management of psychosocial Yellow Flags in acute low back pain.N Z Med J. 2007 May 18;120(1254):U2536. N Z Med J. 2007. PMID: 17515940
-
Management of low back pain and lumbosacral radicular syndrome: the Guideline of the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF).Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Apr;60(2):292-318. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08352-7. Epub 2024 Feb 26. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024. PMID: 38407016 Free PMC article.
-
Inconsistent grading of evidence across countries: a review of low back pain guidelines.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Sep;29(7):576-81, 581.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.07.005. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006. PMID: 16949948 Review.
Cited by
-
A critical review of the role of manual therapy in the treatment of individuals with low back pain.J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Oct;32(5):464-477. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2316393. Epub 2024 Feb 21. J Man Manip Ther. 2024. PMID: 38381584 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Therapeutic injections and manual medicine in low-back pain : Bimodal synergies between evidence and empiricism].Orthopade. 2022 Apr;51(4):307-324. doi: 10.1007/s00132-022-04235-8. Epub 2022 Mar 3. Orthopade. 2022. PMID: 35238966 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
Intervention challenges experienced in physiotherapy and occupational therapy with workers' pain and disability representations: a mixed methods study.J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Feb 20. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10272-9. Online ahead of print. J Occup Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 39976825
-
Chronic non-specific low back pain disability and depressive symptoms in working men and women: a cross-sectional study.Rheumatol Int. 2024 Dec;44(12):2967-2975. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05697-z. Epub 2024 Sep 26. Rheumatol Int. 2024. PMID: 39327275
-
Objective and subjective assessment of back shape and function in persons with and without low back pain.Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 20;15(1):20105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03901-z. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40541976 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous