Super.FELT: supervised feature extraction learning using triplet loss for drug response prediction with multi-omics data
- PMID: 34034645
- PMCID: PMC8152321
- DOI: 10.1186/s12859-021-04146-z
Super.FELT: supervised feature extraction learning using triplet loss for drug response prediction with multi-omics data
Abstract
Background: Predicting the drug response of a patient is important for precision oncology. In recent studies, multi-omics data have been used to improve the prediction accuracy of drug response. Although multi-omics data are good resources for drug response prediction, the large dimension of data tends to hinder performance improvement. In this study, we aimed to develop a new method, which can effectively reduce the large dimension of data, based on the supervised deep learning model for predicting drug response.
Results: We proposed a novel method called Supervised Feature Extraction Learning using Triplet loss (Super.FELT) for drug response prediction. Super.FELT consists of three stages, namely, feature selection, feature encoding using a supervised method, and binary classification of drug response (sensitive or resistant). We used multi-omics data including mutation, copy number aberration, and gene expression, and these were obtained from cell lines [Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC), Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), and Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal (CTRP)], patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDX), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). GDSC was used for training and cross-validation tests, and CCLE, CTRP, PDX, and TCGA were used for external validation. We performed ablation studies for the three stages and verified that the use of multi-omics data guarantees better performance of drug response prediction. Our results verified that Super.FELT outperformed the other methods at external validation on PDX and TCGA and was good at cross-validation on GDSC and external validation on CCLE and CTRP. In addition, through our experiments, we confirmed that using multi-omics data is useful for external non-cell line data.
Conclusion: By separating the three stages, Super.FELT achieved better performance than the other methods. Through our results, we found that it is important to train encoders and a classifier independently, especially for external test on PDX and TCGA. Moreover, although gene expression is the most powerful data on cell line data, multi-omics promises better performance for external validation on non-cell line data than gene expression data. Source codes of Super.FELT are available at https://github.com/DMCB-GIST/Super.FELT .
Keywords: Drug response prediction; Multi-omics data; Pharmacogenomics; Precision oncology; Triplet loss; encoder using supervised methods.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures





Similar articles
-
A fair experimental comparison of neural network architectures for latent representations of multi-omics for drug response prediction.BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Feb 14;24(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05166-7. BMC Bioinformatics. 2023. PMID: 36788531 Free PMC article.
-
Gene-centric multi-omics integration with convolutional encoders for cancer drug response prediction.Comput Biol Med. 2022 Dec;151(Pt A):106192. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106192. Epub 2022 Oct 17. Comput Biol Med. 2022. PMID: 36327883
-
Deep learning assisted multi-omics integration for survival and drug-response prediction in breast cancer.BMC Genomics. 2021 Mar 24;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07524-2. BMC Genomics. 2021. PMID: 33761889 Free PMC article.
-
Dissecting the Genome for Drug Response Prediction.Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2449:187-196. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2095-3_7. Methods Mol Biol. 2022. PMID: 35507263 Review.
-
Machine learning and feature selection for drug response prediction in precision oncology applications.Biophys Rev. 2019 Feb;11(1):31-39. doi: 10.1007/s12551-018-0446-z. Epub 2018 Aug 10. Biophys Rev. 2019. PMID: 30097794 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Omics in Pharmacogenomics: A New Era of Precision Medicine.Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 Jun 26;3(3):100246. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100246. eCollection 2025 Sep. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40881104 Free PMC article. Review.
-
DeepInsight-3D architecture for anti-cancer drug response prediction with deep-learning on multi-omics.Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 11;13(1):2483. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29644-3. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36774402 Free PMC article.
-
PANCDR: precise medicine prediction using an adversarial network for cancer drug response.Brief Bioinform. 2024 Jan 22;25(2):bbae088. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae088. Brief Bioinform. 2024. PMID: 38487849 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning methods for drug response prediction in cancer: Predominant and emerging trends.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 15;10:1086097. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1086097. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36873878 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A survey on multi-omics-based cancer diagnosis using machine learning with the potential application in gastrointestinal cancer.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 10;9:1109365. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1109365. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 36703893 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Yang W, Soares J, Greninger P, Edelman EJ, Lightfoot H, Forbes S, Bindal N, Beare D, Smith JA, Thompson IR, et al. Genomics of drug sensitivity in cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(1362–4962):955–61. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical