Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 25;13(1):92.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00903-0.

Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries

Affiliations

Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries

Richard Milne et al. Genome Med. .

Abstract

Background: Public trust is central to the collection of genomic and health data and the sustainability of genomic research. To merit trust, those involved in collecting and sharing data need to demonstrate they are trustworthy. However, it is unclear what measures are most likely to demonstrate this.

Methods: We analyse the 'Your DNA, Your Say' online survey of public perspectives on genomic data sharing including responses from 36,268 individuals across 22 low-, middle- and high-income countries, gathered in 15 languages. We examine how participants perceived the relative value of measures to demonstrate the trustworthiness of those using donated DNA and/or medical information. We examine between-country variation and present a consolidated ranking of measures.

Results: Providing transparent information about who will benefit from data access was the most important measure to increase trust, endorsed by more than 50% of participants across 20 of 22 countries. It was followed by the option to withdraw data and transparency about who is using data and why. Variation was found for the importance of measures, notably information about sanctions for misuse of data-endorsed by 5% in India but almost 60% in Japan. A clustering analysis suggests alignment between some countries in the assessment of specific measures, such as the UK and Canada, Spain and Mexico and Portugal and Brazil. China and Russia are less closely aligned with other countries in terms of the value of the measures presented.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of transparency about data use and about the goals and potential benefits associated with data sharing, including to whom such benefits accrue. They show that members of the public value knowing what benefits accrue from the use of data. The study highlights the importance of locally sensitive measures to increase trust as genomic data sharing continues globally.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KM, DM, QH and SA declare no competing interests associated with their affiliations. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The appearance of the online Your DNA, Your Say survey (Arabic version). The Your DNA, Your Say questionnaire was presented in 15 languages. Background information on genomic research and data sharing was provided by nine films
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Measures to help trust recipients of donated DNA/medical information. Percentage of participants endorsing each measure proposed to help to trust recipients of donated DNA/medical information, overall and by country
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentage of participants endorsing each measure by country. Boxplots show the percentage endorsing each measure per country, showing the variability associated with each option. Outliers are labelled
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Heatmap of pair-wise correlation estimates. The strength of the pairwise correlation is indicated by the colour of the square, from dark blue to yellow. The dendrogram indicates clustering among countries where responses were closely aligned

References

    1. Kaye J. The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2012;13(1):415–431. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101454. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clayton EW, Halverson CM, Sathe NA, Malin BA. A systematic literature review of individuals’ perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States. PLoS One. 2018;13(10). 10.1371/journal.pone.0204417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ghafur S, Dael JV, Leis M, Darzi A, Sheikh A. Public perceptions on data sharing: key insights from the UK and the USA. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;0(0). 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30161-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Critchley C, Nicol D, Otlowski M. The impact of commercialisation and genetic data sharing arrangements on public trust and the intention to participate in biobank research. Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(3):160–172. doi: 10.1159/000375441. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaskell G, Gottweis H, Starkbaum J, Gerber MM, Broerse J, Gottweis U, Hobbs A, Helén I, Paschou M, Snell K, Soulier A. Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(1):14–20. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.104. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources