Small-head metal on metal total hip arthroplasty is associated with a high rate of complication and reoperation at mid-term follow-up
- PMID: 34035911
- PMCID: PMC8132082
- DOI: 10.1177/20503121211014707
Small-head metal on metal total hip arthroplasty is associated with a high rate of complication and reoperation at mid-term follow-up
Abstract
Background: Adverse reactions to metal debris are significant complications after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Recently, late appearances of adverse reactions to metal debris and subsequent need for reoperations have been reported with small-diameter head metal-on-metal devices. We retrospectively investigated mid-term clinical outcomes of small-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
Methods: We reviewed 159 hips in 139 patients who had a small-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (M2a Taper; Biomet, Warsaw, IN) with a minimum 5-year follow-up and documented postoperative complications.
Results: Focal osteolysis in either the femur or acetabulum was observed in 12 hips (7.5%, 44 months after surgery on average), with pseudotumor observed in 8 hips (5%, 120 months after surgery on average). Four hips (2.5%) had dislocations (84 months after surgery on average) and six hips (3.8%, 122 months after surgery on average) underwent reoperation.
Conclusion: Small-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty is associated with a high degree of complications at mid-term follow-up period. Considering this, we discourage the use of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty regardless of head size.
Keywords: Metal on metal; adverse reactions to metal debris; complication; focal osteolysis; reoperation; total hip arthroplasty.
© The Author(s) 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Systematic Screening of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris after Recap-M2A-Magnum Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.Scand J Surg. 2017 Dec;106(4):342-349. doi: 10.1177/1457496916683093. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Scand J Surg. 2017. PMID: 28737077
-
A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2323-2327. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3819-9. Epub 2018 Feb 18. Int Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29455347
-
Long-Term Outcomes After Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty With a 28-mm Head: A 17- to 23-Year Follow-Up Study of a Previous Report.J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2165-2172. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.089. Epub 2018 Mar 12. J Arthroplasty. 2018. PMID: 29656971
-
Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.Scand J Surg. 2018 Jun;107(2):180-186. doi: 10.1177/1457496917748220. Epub 2018 Jan 15. Scand J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29333941
-
[Mid-term effectiveness of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 15;32(4):389-393. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201709087. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29806294 Free PMC article. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Long-term outcomes of small head metal-on-metal compared to ceramic-on-polyethylene primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based cohort study.Int Orthop. 2025 Mar;49(3):605-612. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06437-z. Epub 2025 Feb 12. Int Orthop. 2025. PMID: 39937240 Free PMC article.
-
Survival rates of different bearing surfaces with the same model of stem in total hip arthroplasty: predictive factors for revision surgery.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4501-4510. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04706-9. Epub 2022 Nov 28. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 36443614
References
-
- Rieker C, Windler M, Wyss U. METASUL—a metal-on-metal bearing. Bern: Hans Huber, 1999.
-
- Rieker CB, Schön R, Köttig P. Development and validation of a second-generation metal-on-metal bearing: laboratory studies and analysis of retrievals. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(8 Suppl. 3): 5–11. - PubMed
-
- Australian Orthopaedic Association. National joint replacement registry annual report. Adelaide, SA, Australia: Australian Orthopaedic Association, 2009.
-
- de Steiger RN, Hang JR, Miller LN, et al.. Five-year results of the ASR XL acetabular system and the ASR hip resurfacing system: an analysis from the Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(24): 2287–2293. - PubMed
-
- Jameson SS, Langton DJ, Nargol AV. Articular surface replacement of the hip: a prospective single-surgeon series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(1): 28–37. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources