Promising Aging in Community Models in the U.S.: Village, Naturally Occurring Retirement Community (NORC), Cohousing, and University-Based Retirement Community (UBRC)
- PMID: 34036119
- PMCID: PMC8127739
- DOI: 10.1177/23337214211015451
Promising Aging in Community Models in the U.S.: Village, Naturally Occurring Retirement Community (NORC), Cohousing, and University-Based Retirement Community (UBRC)
Abstract
Aging in Community (AIC) is the preferred way to age. This systematic review identified promising AIC models in the U.S. and analyzed model characteristics and push-pull factors from older adults' perspectives. Push factors are those driving older adults to leave, while pull factors attract them to stay in a community. We conducted a two-phase search strategy using eight databases. Phase I identified promising AIC models and Phase II expanded each specific model identified. Fifty-two of 244 screened articles met the criteria and were analyzed. We identified four promising AIC models with the potential to achieve person-environment (P-E) fit, including village, naturally occurring retirement community (NORC), cohousing, and university-based retirement community (UBRC). Each has a unique way of helping older adults with their aging needs. Similar and unique push-pull factors of each AIC model were discussed. Analyses showed that pull factors were mostly program factors while push factors were often individual circumstances. Continued research is needed to address the challenges of recruiting minority older adults and those of lower socio-economic status, meeting older adults' diverse and dynamic needs, and conducting comparative studies to share lessons learned across the globe.
Keywords: aging in community; cohousing; naturally occurring retirement community; university-based retirement community; village.
© The Author(s) 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Ailshire J., García C. (2018). Unequal places: The impacts of socioeconomic and race/ethnic differences in neighborhoods. Generations, 42(2), 20–27.
-
- Bedney B. J., Goldberg R. B., Josephson K. (2010). Aging in place in naturally occurring retirement communities: Transforming aging through supportive service programs. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 24(3/4), 304–321. 10.1080/02763893.2010.522455 - DOI
-
- Blanchard J. M. (2013). Aging in community: The communitarian alternative to aging at home, alone. Generations, 37(4), 6–13.
-
- Bookman A. (2008). Innovative models of aging in place: Transforming our communities for an aging population. Community, Work & Family, 11(4), 419–438. 10.1080/13668800802362334 - DOI
-
- Bronstein L., Gellis Z. D., Kenaley B. L. (2011). A neighborhood naturally occurring retirement community: Views from providers and residents. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 30(1), 104–112. 10.1177/0733464809354730. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
