Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 1;5(5):e2020GH000348.
doi: 10.1029/2020GH000348. eCollection 2021 May.

Demographic Assessment of Mono(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate (MEHP) and Monoethyl Phthalate (MEP) Concentrations in Common Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) From Sarasota Bay, FL, USA

Affiliations

Demographic Assessment of Mono(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate (MEHP) and Monoethyl Phthalate (MEP) Concentrations in Common Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) From Sarasota Bay, FL, USA

M K Dziobak et al. Geohealth. .

Abstract

Common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) have previously demonstrated exposure to phthalate esters. Phthalates and phthalate esters are commonly added to consumer goods to enhance desirable properties. As the amount of plastic marine debris increases, these chemicals can easily leach from these products into the surrounding environment. To evaluate demographic variability in exposure, eight phthalate metabolites were quantified in urine samples collected from free-ranging bottlenose dolphins sampled in Sarasota Bay, FL, USA (2010-2019; n = 51). Approximately 75% of individual dolphins had detectable concentrations of at least one phthalate metabolite. The most frequently detected metabolites were mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP; n = 28; GM = 4.57 ng/mL; 95% CI = 2.37-8.80; KM mean = 7.95; s.d. = 15.88) and monoethyl phthalate (MEP; GM = 4.51 ng/mL; 95% CI = 2.77-7.34; ROS mean = 2.24; s.d. = 5.58). Urinary concentrations of MEHP and MEP were not significantly different between sex (MEHP p = 0.09; MEP p = 0.22) or age class (i.e., calf/juvenile vs. adult; MEHP p = 0.67; MEP p = 0.13). Additionally, there were no significant group differences in the likelihood of MEHP or MEP detection for any demographic as determined by a Peto-Peto test. Frequency of detection was similar for both metabolites between males and females (MEHP p = 0.10; MEP p = 0.40) as well as between juveniles and adults (MEHP p = 0.50; MEP: p = 0.60). These findings suggest ubiquitous exposure risk for both sexes and age classes, warranting further investigation into potential sources and health implications.

Keywords: anthropogenic contaminant; endocrine disruptor; marine mammal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MEHP (a) and MEP (b) comparisons by demographic for bottlenose dolphins sampled in Sarasota Bay, Florida, 2010–2019. The black center circle represents the geometric mean concentration for the demographic, while the bars represent 95% confidence intervals. There were no significant differences between sexes (Mann‐Whitney U‐test; MEHP: p = 0.09; MEP: p = 0.22) or age classes (Mann‐Whitney U‐test; MEHP: p = 0.67; MEP: p = 0.13).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ATSDR . (1995). Toxicological profile for diethyl phthalate. ATSDR’s Toxicological Profiles. 10.1201/9781420061888_ch74 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ATSDR . (2001). Toxicological profile for di‐N‐butyl phthalate. GA. - PubMed
    1. ATSDR . (2017). Interaction profile for chlorinated dibenzo ‐p‐ dioxins. POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHERS. - PubMed
    1. ATSDR . (2019). Toxicological profile for di(2‐Ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) draft for public comment. GA. - PubMed
    1. Aurela, B. , Kulmala, H. , & Soderhjelm, L. (1999). Phthalates in paper and board packaging and their migration into tenax and sugar. Food Additives & Contaminants, 16, 571–577. 10.1080/026520399283713 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources