Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;19(2):253-261.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13626. Epub 2021 May 25.

A nomogram prediction model for sternal incision problems

Affiliations

A nomogram prediction model for sternal incision problems

Pan You et al. Int Wound J. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Presently, the incidence and mortality rates of sternal incision problems (SIPs) after thoracotomy remain high, and no effective preventive measures are available. The data on 23 182 patients at Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University treated with median sternotomy from 1 August 2009 to 31 July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A prediction model of SIPs after median thoracotomy was established using R software and then validated using the bootstrap method. Next, the validity and accuracy of the model were tested and evaluated. In total, 15 426 cases met the requirements of the present study, among which 309 cases were diagnosed with SIPs, with an incidence rate of 2%. The body mass index (BMI), intensive care unit (ICU) time, diabetes mellitus, and revision for bleeding were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative SIPs. The nomogram model achieved good discrimination (73.9%) and accuracy (70.2%) in predicting the risk of SIPs after median thoracotomy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under curve of the model was 0.705 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.746-0.803); the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that χ2 = 6.987 and P = 0.538, and the fitting degree of the calibration curve was good. Additionally, the clinical decision curve showed that the net benefit of the model was greater than 0, and the clinical application value was high. The nomogram based on BMI, ICU time, diabetes mellitus, and revision for bleeding can predict the individualised risk of SIPs after median sternotomy, showing good discrimination and accuracy, and has high clinical application value. It also provides significant guidance for screening high-risk populations and developing intervention strategies.

Keywords: median thoracotomy; nomogram; prediction model; sternal incision problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Nomogram to predict sternal incision problems (SIPs) after median sternotomy. To use this nomogram in individual patients, the information for four (axes 2‐5) risk factors should be visualised as a point on the first axis. Next, the sum of these three points out of the total number of points should be plotted on axis 6. Next, a line is drawn downward towards the risk axis (axis 7) to determine the likelihood of an SIP in an individual patient
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of our model to predict sternal incision problems after median sternotomy
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Calibration curve to predict sternal incision problems (SIPs) after median sternotomy. The nomogram‐predicted probability of the SIP is plotted on the x‐axis, and the actual SIP is plotted on the y‐axis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kirmani BH, Mazhar K, Saleh HZ, et al. External validity of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk stratification tool for deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery in a UK population. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17(3):479‐484. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phoon PHY, Hwang NC. Deep sternal wound infection: diagnosis, treatment and prevention. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34(6):1602‐1613. - PubMed
    1. Sharif M, Wong CHM, Harky A. Sternal wound infections, risk factors and management ‐ how far are we? A literature review. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(6):835‐843. - PubMed
    1. O'Hara LM, Thom KA, Preas MA. Update to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection (2017): a summary, review, and strategies for implementation. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46(6):602‐609. - PubMed
    1. Berrios‐Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784‐791. - PubMed