Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1988 Aug;82(2):413-9.
doi: 10.1172/JCI113613.

Cardiac and peripheral circulatory responses to angiotension and vasopressin in dogs

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cardiac and peripheral circulatory responses to angiotension and vasopressin in dogs

R W Lee et al. J Clin Invest. 1988 Aug.

Abstract

To determine the cardiac and peripheral circulatory responses to changes in afterload with angiotension and vasopressin, we increased mean aortic pressure 25% and 50% above control in splenectomized and ganglion-blocked dogs. We compared these responses to similar mechanical increases in aortic pressure produced by partial balloon occlusion of the descending aorta. With 25% or 50% increases in aortic pressure, angiotensin, vasopressin, and balloon inflation produced no changes in heart rate, right atrial, and mean pulmonary artery pressures. At 25% increase in aortic pressure, cardiac output was maintained with angiotensin and balloon occlusion but decreased with vasopressin. At 50% increase in aortic pressure, cardiac output was maintained with only balloon occlusion and decreased with both angiotensin and vasopressin. Whenever cardiac output fell, central blood volume did not increase as after-load increased. These changes in preload can be explained by alterations in the venous circulation. Vasopressin did not alter venous compliance or unstressed vascular volume but increased resistance to venous return. Angiotensin also increased resistance to venous return but decreased venous compliance and did not change unstressed vascular volume. Balloon occlusion had no effects on these parameters. We conclude that: (a) angiotensin caused significant venoconstriction resulting in maintenance of cardiac output at 25% but not 50% increase in aortic pressure; (b) vasopressin increased the resistance to venous return without venoconstriction; this resulted in a fall in cardiac output even with a 25% increase in aortic pressure; and (c) the effects of the agents on the venous circulation were independent of the mechanical effects of a pressure increase in the arterial circulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Physiol. 1979 Nov;237(5):H550-4 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1987 Jul;253(1 Pt 2):H126-32 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1980 Sep;239(3):H391-8 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1981 Mar;63(3):645-51 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1981 Jul 30;305(5):263-6 - PubMed

Publication types