Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2021 May 26;21(1):221.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01356-8.

Comparison of cervical cancer screening by self-sampling papillomavirus test versus pap-smear in underprivileged women in France

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Comparison of cervical cancer screening by self-sampling papillomavirus test versus pap-smear in underprivileged women in France

Laura Reques et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare cervical cancer screening by pap smear (PS) versus preliminary HPV testing based on self-collected samples (SC-HPV).

Methods: Interventional study among underprivileged women from 25 to 65 years old in four French cities. The control group (CG) was referred for a PS. The experimental group (EG) conducted a SC-HPV test followed by a PS in case of positivity. Differences on screening completion and cytological abnormalities were analysed by logistic and Cox regression.

Results: 383 women were assigned to the EG and 304 to the CG. The screening completion proportion was 39.5% in the CG compared to 71.3% in the EG (HR = 2.48 (CI 95% [1.99-3.08]; p < 0.001). The proportion of cytological abnormalities was 2.0% in the CG and 2.3% in the EG (OR = 1.20 (CI 95% [0.42-3.40]; p = 0.7). The proportion of participants lost to follow-up was 60.5% in the CG and 63.2% in the EG HPV positive (p = 0.18).

Conclusion: Providing an SC-HPV-test increased the participation of underprivileged women in CCS. Nevertheless, the significant number of lost to follow-up in both groups can undermine the initial benefits of the strategy for HPV positive women. Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03118258.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Papillomavirus; SC-HPV; Screening; Vulnerability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sub-group analysis using a forest plot representing the cervical cancer screening completion rate
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sub-group analysis using a forest plot representing the detection of cytological cervical abnormalities

References

    1. Centre National de Référence des Papillomavirus Humains (CNR HPV), Institut Pasteur. Référence des Papillomavirus Humains (CNR HPV), Institut Pasteur. In 2018. Disponible sur: www.pasteur.fr/fr/centre-medical/fiches-maladies/cancer-du-coluterus-pap...
    1. Garnier A, Brindel P. Prévention et dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus. Boulogne [Internet]. Billancourt: Institut National du Cancer; 2013. Disponible sur: www.ecancer.fr/publications/75-prevention/735-prevention-et-depistage-du....
    1. Institute National du Cancer. La situation du cancer en France. 2012.
    1. Schiffman M, Doorbar J, Wentzensen N, de Sanjosé S, Fakhry C, Monk BJ, et al. Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 01 2016;2:16086. - PubMed
    1. GLOBOCAN [Internet]. Disponible sur: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3322/caac.21492) - DOI

Publication types

Associated data