A multi-registry analysis of military and civilian penetrating cervical carotid artery injury
- PMID: 34039922
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003296
A multi-registry analysis of military and civilian penetrating cervical carotid artery injury
Abstract
Introduction: Penetrating cervical carotid artery injury is an uncommon but high-stake scenario associated with stroke and death. The objective of this study was to characterize and compare penetrating carotid injury in the military and civilian setting, as well as provide considerations for management.
Methods: Cohorts with penetrating cervical carotid artery injury from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (2002-2015) and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Prospective Observation Vascular Injury Treatment Registry (2012-2018) were analyzed. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator multivariate analysis using random forest-based imputation was performed to identify risk factors affecting stroke and mortality.
Results: There were a total of 157 patients included in the study, of which 56 (35.7%) were military and 101 (64.3%) were civilian. The military cohort was more likely to have been managed with open surgery (87.5% vs. 44.6%, p < 0.001) and to have had any procedure to restore or maintain flow to the brain (71.4% vs. 35.6%, p < 0.001), while the civilian cohort was more likely to undergo nonoperative management (45.5% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001). Stroke rate was higher within the military cohort (41.1% vs. 13.9%, p < 0.001); however, mortality did not differ between the groups (12.5% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.52). On multivariate analysis, predictors for stroke were presence of a battle injury (log odds, 2.1; p < 0.001) and internal or common carotid artery ligation (log odds 1.5, p = 0.009). For mortality outcome, protective factors included a high Glasgow Coma Scale on admission (log odds, -0.21 per point; p < 0.001). Increased admission Injury Severity Score was a predictor of mortality (log odds, 0.05 per point; p = 0.005).
Conclusion: The stroke rate was higher in the military cohort, possibly reflecting complexity of injury; however, there was no difference in mortality between military and civilian patients. For significant injuries, concerted efforts should be made at carotid reconstruction to reduce the occurrence of stroke.
Level of evidence: Retrospective cohort analysis, level III.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Management and outcomes of wartime cervical carotid artery injury.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Aug;89(2S Suppl 2):S225-S230. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002755. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020. PMID: 32345900
-
Epidemiology, repair technique, and predictors of stroke and mortality in penetrating carotid artery injuries.J Vasc Surg. 2023 Oct;78(4):920-928. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.019. Epub 2023 Jun 26. J Vasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 37379894
-
Risk factors for stroke in penetrating cerebrovascular injuries.J Vasc Surg. 2024 Oct;80(4):1064-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.061. Epub 2024 Jun 5. J Vasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 38849104
-
Management of penetrating injuries to carotid artery.World J Surg. 2001 Aug;25(8):1028-35. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0055-y. World J Surg. 2001. PMID: 11571968 Review.
-
Evolving Strategies for the Management of Carotid Artery Injuries due to Penetrating Trauma.Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Apr;113:421-426. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.09.046. Epub 2024 Oct 15. Ann Vasc Surg. 2025. PMID: 39413996 Review.
Cited by
-
MicroNET-covered stent use to seal carotid artery perforation.Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2023 Sep;19(3):284-288. doi: 10.5114/aic.2023.131483. Epub 2023 Sep 27. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2023. PMID: 37854974 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Hybrid Endovascular and Direct Surgical Approach for Treatment of Penetrating Common Carotid Artery Injury: A Case Report.NMC Case Rep J. 2024 Dec 3;11:377-382. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0148. eCollection 2024. NMC Case Rep J. 2024. PMID: 39717206 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Feliciano DV, Bitondo CG, Mattox KL, Burch JM, Jordan GL Jr., Beall AC Jr., De Bakey ME. Civilian trauma in the 1980s. Ann Surg . 1984;199(6):717–724.
-
- Hughes CW. Arterial repair during the Korean war. Ann Surg . 1958;147(4):555–561.
-
- Patel JA, White JM, White PW, Rich NM, Rasmussen TE. A contemporary, 7-year analysis of vascular injury from the war in Afghanistan. J Vasc Surg . 2018;68(6):1872–1879.
-
- White JM, Stannard A, Burkhardt GE, Eastridge BJ, Blackbourne LH, Rasmussen TE. The epidemiology of vascular injury in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Ann Surg . 2011;253(6):1184–1189.
-
- DeBakey ME, Simeone FA. Battle injuries of the arteries in World War II: an analysis of 2,471 cases. Ann Surg . 1946;123(4):534–579.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials