Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep;125(6):780-788.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01422-w. Epub 2021 May 26.

The breast is yet to come: current and future utility of circulating tumour DNA in breast cancer

Affiliations
Review

The breast is yet to come: current and future utility of circulating tumour DNA in breast cancer

Brad A Davidson et al. Br J Cancer. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Advances in genomic strategies and the development of targeted therapies have enabled precision medicine to revolutionise the field of oncology. Precision medicine uses patient-specific genetic and molecular information, traditionally obtained from tumour biopsy samples, to classify tumours and treat them accordingly. However, biopsy samples often fail to provide complete tumour profiling, and the technique is expensive and, of course, relatively invasive. Advances in genomic techniques have led to improvements in the isolation and detection of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), a component of a peripheral blood draw/liquid biopsy. Liquid biopsy offers a minimally invasive method to gather genetic information that is representative of a global snapshot of both primary and metastatic sites and can thereby provide invaluable information for potential targeted therapies and methods for tumour surveillance. However, a lack of prospective clinical trials showing direct patient benefit has limited the implementation of liquid biopsies in standard clinical applications. Here, we review the potential of ctDNA obtained by liquid biopsy to revolutionise personalised medicine and discuss current applications of ctDNA both at the benchtop and bedside.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B.H.P. is a paid consultant for Jackson Labs, Casdin Capital, Pathovax, Sermonix and is a paid scientific advisory board member for Celcuity Inc. Under separate licensing agreements between Horizon Discovery, Ltd and The Johns Hopkins University, S.C. and B.H.P. are entitled to a share of royalties received by the University on sales of products. The terms of this arrangement are being managed by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. B.A.D. declares no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic of sample processing for isolation of cfDNA.
Blood samples are collected in tubes made specifically to stabilize all cfDNA. The collected sample is then centrifuged and cfDNA-containing plasma is isolated. Remaining cellular contamination is eliminated with a final centrifugation, and cfDNA is isolated and purified through a variety of commercial kits.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. cfDNA technologies mentioned in this review.
Cell-free DNA is primarily analyzed for ctDNA content by PCR-based techniques or NGS-based techniques. In the PCR-based techniques few variants are probed at once whereas in NGS-based techniques many genes are queried in one sequencing run. Each technique has benefits and drawbacks regarding time, money, breadth, sensitivity, and scalability. Images were adapted from literature cited in the text.

References

    1. Meisel JL, Venur VA, Gnant M, Carey L. Evolution of targeted therapy in breast cancer: where precision medicine began. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book. 2018;38:78–86. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_201037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Condorelli R, Mosele F, Verret B, Bachelot T, Bedard PL, Cortes J, et al. Genomic alterations in breast cancer: level of evidence for actionability according to ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:365–373. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Overman MJ, Modak J, Kopetz S, Murthy R, Yao JC, Hicks ME, et al. Use of research biopsies in clinical trials: are risks and benefits adequately discussed? J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:17–22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1718. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poulet G, Massias J, Taly V. Liquid biopsy: general concepts. Acta Cytol. 2019;63:449–455. doi: 10.1159/000499337. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chae YK, Davis AA, Jain S, Santa-Maria C, Flaum L, Beaubier N, et al. Concordance of genomic alterations by next-generation sequencing in tumor tissue versus circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017;16:1412–1420. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0061. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types