Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 10:15:535542.
doi: 10.3389/fninf.2021.535542. eCollection 2021.

Validation of Affect-tag Affective and Cognitive Indicators

Affiliations

Validation of Affect-tag Affective and Cognitive Indicators

Laurent Sparrow et al. Front Neuroinform. .

Abstract

The Affect-tag solution measures physiological signals to deliver indicators derived from cognitive science. To provide the most accurate and effective results, a database of electrodermal activity (EDA) signals acquired using the Affect-tag A1 band was created. An experimental paradigm was designed to measure action-taking, autonomic regulation, cognitive load (CL), emotions, and stress, affects, and social stress. The Affect-tag emotional power (EP), emotional density (ED), and CL affective and cognitive indicators were refined based on the physiological responses of 48 participants during these tasks. Statistical significance was obtained for all indicators in tasks they were designed to measure, resulting in a total accuracy score of 89% for the combined indicators. Data obtained during this study will be further analyzed to define emotional and affective states.

Keywords: affective computing; bio-signal; cognitive load; electrodermal acitivity; emotional states discrimination; wearable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HS, LV and OJ were employed by the company NEOTROPE. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Raw EDA signals for a single participant simultaneously measured using BIOPAC and Affect-tag.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of participants vs. reaction time intervals during the reaction time tests showing an asymmetric Gaussian distribution.

Similar articles

References

    1. Al-Shargie F., Kiguchi M., Badruddin N., Dass S. C., Hani A. F. M., Tang T. B., et al. . (2016). Mental stress assessment using simultaneous measurement of EEG and fNIRS. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 3882–3898. 10.1364/BOE.7.003882 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bagherli J., Vaez-Mousavi S. M., Mokhtari P. (2011). Effects of arousal and activation on simple and discriminative reaction time in a stimulated arousal state. World App. Sci. J. 12, 1877–1882.
    1. Benedek M., Kaernbach C. (2010). A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. J. Neurosci. Methods 190, 80–91. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berntson G. G., Cacioppo J. T., Binkley P. F., Uchino B. N., Quigley K. S., Fieldstone A., et al. . (1994). Autonomic cardiac control. III. Psychological stress and cardiac response in autonomic space as revealed by pharmacological blockades. Psychophysiology 31, 599–608. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02352.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boucsein W. (2012). Electrodermal Activity. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources