Prevalence and Correlates of Sext-Sharing Among a Representative Sample of Youth in the Netherlands
- PMID: 34040564
- PMCID: PMC8143518
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655796
Prevalence and Correlates of Sext-Sharing Among a Representative Sample of Youth in the Netherlands
Abstract
Many adolescents use their electronic devices to send each other sexually explicit texts, photos, and videos of themselves-commonly known as sexting. This can be fun and is not usually problematic. However, if the intended recipient decides to share these sexts with a broader audience, the consequences for the depicted can be detrimental. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of (non-consensual) sext-sharing among Dutch adolescents and explore the characteristics of those who do, to gain a better understanding of factors involved in dissemination. We used data from "Sex under the age of 25," a representative national survey on sexual health among a sample of 20,834 Dutch 12-24-year-olds. The prevalence of sext-sharing was estimated using Complex Samples. Logistic regressions were used to assess associations between demographics, school-based sexting education, sexual- and online behavior, and mental health and sext-sharing. About 4% of the adolescents reported having shared someone else's sext in the last six months. Being male, aged 12-14 years, frequent social media usage, watching online porn, sexual experience, and being subjected to sext-sharing themselves associated most strongly with sext-sharing. Our findings show that the likelihood of sext-sharing is lower in older adolescents and that it associates with the extent of adolescents' sexual curiosity and online activity. The overlap between sharing sexts of others and having one's own sext shared suggests that dissemination of personal sexual content might be normalized or used as an act of retribution. Further research could be helpful to explain the mechanisms underlying this overlap. The results of this study illustrate the importance of exposing adolescents to evidence based preventive educational interventions on sexting from 12 years onwards and not just within the context of traditional school-based sex education, but also as a part of the (online) media-literacy curriculum.
Keywords: adolescents; non-consensual sharing; online sexual risk behavior; sexting; social media.
Copyright © 2021 Boer, Erdem, de Graaf and Götz.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Sexually explicit cell phone messaging associated with sexual risk among adolescents.Pediatrics. 2012 Oct;130(4):667-73. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0021. Epub 2012 Sep 17. Pediatrics. 2012. PMID: 22987882 Free PMC article.
-
Sext Dissemination: Differences across Nations in Motivations and Associations.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 2;18(5):2429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052429. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33801431 Free PMC article.
-
Sexting among singles in the USA: prevalence of sending, receiving, and sharing sexual messages and images.Sex Health. 2016 Jul 29. doi: 10.1071/SH15240. Online ahead of print. Sex Health. 2016. PMID: 27470210
-
Prevalence of Multiple Forms of Sexting Behavior Among Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Apr 1;172(4):327-335. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314. JAMA Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 29482215 Free PMC article.
-
[Sexting as a risk? : On consensual and non-consensual distribution of personal erotic pictures using digital media].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Sep;60(9):1034-1039. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2595-9. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017. PMID: 28741189 Review. German.
Cited by
-
The Role of Consent and Motivations in Sext Dissemination.J Interpers Violence. 2023 Aug;38(15-16):9315-9342. doi: 10.1177/08862605231163886. Epub 2023 Apr 17. J Interpers Violence. 2023. PMID: 37067003 Free PMC article.
-
A Latent Profile Analysis of the Consensual and Non-Consensual Sexting Experiences among Canadian Adolescents.Youth Soc. 2024 May;56(4):713-733. doi: 10.1177/0044118X231202814. Epub 2023 Sep 30. Youth Soc. 2024. PMID: 38586084 Free PMC article.
-
Did They Deserve It? Adolescents' Perception of Online Harassment in a Real-Case Scenario.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17040. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417040. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36554921 Free PMC article.
-
Validation and adaptation of the diffusion of intimate images among adolescents (EDIMA) scale in adolescents from Peru.Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 16;15:1399423. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1399423. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39759416 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors for Non-Consensual Sexting Among Adolescents and Emerging Adults: An Extension of the Routine Activity Theory Perspective.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jul;53(7):2583-2596. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02903-8. Epub 2024 Jun 11. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 38862864
References
-
- Agnew R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology 30, 47–87. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x - DOI
-
- Ahlmark N., Holst-Algren M., Holmberg T., Nørredam M. L., Smith-Nielsen S., Benedicte-Blom., et al. . (2015). Survey nonresponse among ethnic minorities in a national health survey-a mixed-method study of participation, barriers, and potentials. Ethn. Health. 20, 611–632. 10.1080/13557858.2014.979768 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Albury K., Crawford K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people's ethics: Beyond Megan's Story. J. Media Cult. Stud. 26, 463–473. 10.1080/10304312.2012.665840 - DOI
-
- Anastassiou A. (2017). Sexting and young people: a review of the qualitative literature. Qual. Rep. 22, 2231–2239. 10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2951 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources