Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 19;15(2):89-96.
doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200203.

Current concepts in diagnosis and management of common upper limb nerve injuries in children

Affiliations

Current concepts in diagnosis and management of common upper limb nerve injuries in children

Nunzio Catena et al. J Child Orthop. .

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) of the upper limb are a common event in the paediatric population, following both fractures and soft tissues injuries. Open injuries should in theory be easier to identify and the repair of injured structures performed as soon as possible in order to obtain a satisfying outcome. Conversely, due to the reduced compliance of younger children during clinical assessment, the diagnosis of a closed nerve injury may sometimes be delayed. As the compliance of patients is influenced by pain, anxiety and stress, the execution of the clinical manoeuvres intended to identify a loss of motor function or sensibility, can be impaired. Although the majority of PNI are neuroapraxias resulting in spontaneous recovery, there are open questions regarding certain aspects of closed PNI, e.g. when to ask for electrophysiological exams, when and how long to wait for a spontaneous recovery and when a surgical approach becomes mandatory. The aim of the article is therefore to analyse the main aspects of the different closed PNI of the upper limb in order to provide recommendations for timely and correct management, and to determine differences in the PNI treatment between children and adults.

Keywords: median nerve; nerve injury; radial nerve; trauma; ulnar nerve.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Clinical features of a Gartland III supracondylar humeral fracture (a) with median nerve (b) entrapment in the fracture site.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Radial nerve lesion after Monteggia injury (a, b); motor recovery of the extensor communis digitorum and extensor longus pollicis after nerve repair (c, d).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Medial pinning for supracondylar humeral fractures (a, b) with ulnar nerve injuries (c, d).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Skin wrinkle test; the right side had a median injury secondary to a supracondylar fracture.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
An algorithm for diagnosis and treatment based on the experience of both authors and the current literature (US, Ultrasound; EMG, Electromiography)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Senes FM, Campus R, Becchetti F, Catena N. Upper limb nerve injuries in developmental age. Microsurgery 2009;29:529-535. - PubMed
    1. Ristic S, Strauch RJ, Rosenwasser MP. The assessment and treatment of nerve dysfunction after trauma around the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;370:138-153. - PubMed
    1. Tomaszewski R, Wozowicz A, Wysocka-Wojakiewicz P. Analysis of early neurovascular complications of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a long-term observation. BioMed Res Int 2017;2017:2803790. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Culp RW, Osterman AL, Davidson RS, Skirven T, Bora FW Jr. Neural injuries associated with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72-A:1211-1215. - PubMed
    1. Campbell CC, Waters PM, Emans JB, Kasser JR, Millis MB. Neurovascular injury and displacement in type III supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:47-52. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources