Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 23;8(1):152-184.
doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1741372.

Person- and job-specific factors of intuitive decision-making in clinical practice: results of a sample survey among Hungarian physicians and nurses

Affiliations

Person- and job-specific factors of intuitive decision-making in clinical practice: results of a sample survey among Hungarian physicians and nurses

Gabor Ruzsa et al. Health Psychol Behav Med. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the prevalence of intuitive decision-making (IDM) among health care practitioners (HCPs) and explore its person- and job-specific factors. Design and Outcome Measures: We used on-line survey data from a cross-sectional sample of Hungarian physicians and nurses (N = 460) to assess their reliance on IDM. In a second survey we asked physicians (N = 104) to rate medical specialties on dimensions of 'emergency' (necessity of making instantaneous decisions in unforeseeable situations) and 'complexity' (necessity of considering multiple perceptual and diagnostic aspects of patients' health condition along with diverse treatment options). Results: Altogether 40% of participants reported ever relying on IDM. Using logistic regression analysis, we found the estimated probability of IDM was 0.24 greater for physicians than for nurses, 0.10 greater for females than for males, and 0.11 greater for advanced level HCPs than for novices. Reaching expert level further increased (by 0.31) the probability of IDM for physicians, but not for nurses. Concerning physicians, practicing in a medical specialty of 'high likelihood of emergency' or 'high complexity' increased the probability of IDM by 0.25 and 0.23; the same effects for nurses were 0.20 and 0.07. We found some (inconclusive) evidence for education positively influencing HCPs' propensity for IDM. Additionally, we performed content analysis of participants' free-text answers to explore the psychological background of IDM instances. HCPs educated in the subject of IDM were found more disposed to perform or request further medical investigation, less prone to deviate from medical protocols, apter to reflect on their mental processes, and more inclined to rely on a large scope of information for their decisions. Conclusions: The associations between job- and person-specific factors and HCPs' propensity for IDM may have implications for their training and allocation in the health care system. Education has great potential for enhancing the quality of IDM in clinical practice.

Keywords: Intuition; clinical decision-making; clinical expertise; complexity; emergency; medical education; medical specialties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Within-groups sum of absolution deviations (WSAD) for different choices of classification thresholds based on mean ‘complexity’ and ‘likelihood of emergency’ ratings of medical specialties.

References

    1. Agor, W. H. (1986). The logic of intuition: How top executives make important decisions. Organizational Dynamics, 14(3), 5–18. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(86)90028-8 - DOI
    1. Benner, P., & Tanner, C. A. (1987). Clinical judgment: How expert nurses use intuition. The American Journal of Nursing, 87(1), 23–31. - PubMed
    1. Bodemer, N., Hanoch, Y., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2015). Heuristics: Foundations for a novel approach to medical decision making. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 10(2), 195–203. doi: 10.1007/s11739-014-1143-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bowen, J. L. (2006). Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355(21), 2217–2225. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra054782 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brush, J. E., Sherbino, J., & Norman, G. R. (2017). How expert clinicians intuitively recognize a medical diagnosis. American Journal of Medicine, 130(6), 629–634. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.045 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources