Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 10:11:656218.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.656218. eCollection 2021.

Immunotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Where We Stand

Affiliations
Review

Immunotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Where We Stand

Alessandro Isidori et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

In the past few years, our improved knowledge of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pathogenesis has led to the accelerated discovery of new drugs and the development of innovative therapeutic approaches. The role of the immune system in AML development, growth and recurrence has gained increasing interest. A better understanding of immunological escape and systemic tolerance induced by AML blasts has been achieved. The extraordinary successes of immune therapies that harness the power of T cells in solid tumors and certain hematological malignancies have provided new stimuli in this area of research. Accordingly, major efforts have been made to develop immune therapies for the treatment of AML patients. The persistence of leukemia stem cells, representing the most relevant cause of relapse, even after allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT), remains a major hurdle in the path to cure for AML patients. Several clinical trials with immune-based therapies are currently ongoing in the frontline, relapsed/refractory, post-allo-SCT and minimal residual disease/maintenance setting, with the aim to improve survival of AML patients. This review summarizes the available data with immune-based therapeutic modalities such as monoclonal antibodies (naked and conjugated), T cell engagers, adoptive T-cell therapy, adoptive-NK therapy, checkpoint blockade via PD-1/PD-L1, CTLA4, TIM3 and macrophage checkpoint blockade via the CD47/SIRPa axis, and leukemia vaccines. Combining clinical results with biological immunological findings, possibly coupled with the discovery of biomarkers predictive for response, will hopefully allow us to determine the best approaches to immunotherapy in AML.

Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; checkpoint inhibitors; immunotherapy; monoclonal antibody; natural killer; tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Döhner H, Weisdorf DJ, Bloomfield CD. Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med (2015) 373:1136–52. 10.1056/NEJMra1406184 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Isidori A, Venditti A, Maurillo L, Buccisano F, Loscocco F, Manduzio P, et al. . Alternative Novel Therapies for the Treatment of Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients. Expert Rev Hematol (2013) 6:767–84. 10.1586/17474086.2013.858018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Short NJ, Konopleva M, Kadia TM, Borthakur G, Ravandi F, DiNardo CD, et al. . Advances in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: New Drugs and New Challenges. Cancer Discovery (2020) 10:506–25. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-1011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daver N, Wei AH, Pollyea DA, Fathi AT, Vyas P, DiNardo CD. New Directions for Emerging Therapies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Next Chapter. Blood Cancer J (2020) 10:107. 10.1038/s41408-020-00376-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pollyea DA, Amaya M, Strati P, Konopleva MY, Venetoclax for AML. Changing the Treatment Paradigm. Blood Adv (2019) 3:4326–35. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000937 - DOI - PMC - PubMed