Efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - A clinical trial
- PMID: 34041053
- PMCID: PMC8138352
- DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1459_20
Efficacy evaluation of rubber cup and air polishing techniques using glycine in plaque and stain removal - A clinical trial
Abstract
Background: Researchers have proved Glycine to be safe, less abrasive, sweet and comfortable for patients. It is beneficial in removing plaque as well as stains. The present study aims to compare the plaque and extrinsic stain removal efficacy of the air-polishing device and rubber cup prophylaxis technique along with a comparative evaluation of the gingival trauma caused by both the techniques.
Method: This split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted on a total of 60 subjects in half of whom, left side was assigned to Glycine powder air polishing and the right side to rubber cup prophylaxis with (Glycine powder) and vice versa in the other half. All the subjects had their calculus removed one month prior to the intervention. Plaque index, Stain index and Trauma index were recorded and statistical analysis was done.
Results: Both the techniques (RCP and AP) demonstrated a significant reduction in plaque and stains within their respective groups, but revealed non-significant differences between the study groups. Gingival trauma was found to be significantly higher in case of AP group. Rubber cup technique was preferred over air polishing by the subjects.
Conclusion: The data indicates that both the techniques were equally beneficial for plaque and stain removal, but rubber cup polishing technique has an advantage over the air polishing technique.
Keywords: Air polishing; glycine; plaque; rubber cup; stain.
Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
A comparative evaluation of plaque-removing efficacy of air polishing and rubber-cup, bristle brush with paste polishing on oral hygiene status: A clinical study.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;5(6):457-62. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.167723. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015. PMID: 26759798 Free PMC article.
-
Conventional versus comprehensive dental prophylaxis: comparing the clinical outcomes between rubber cup and air polishing and the importance of plaque disclosure.Quintessence Int. 2021;52(3):264-274. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a45602. Quintessence Int. 2021. PMID: 33491396 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized controlled trial on the plaque-removing efficacy of a low-abrasive air-polishing system to improve oral health care.Quintessence Int. 2021 Sep 9;52(9):752-762. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b1763661. Quintessence Int. 2021. PMID: 34269042 Clinical Trial.
-
Air polishing: a review of current literature.J Dent Hyg. 2013 Aug;87(4):173-80. J Dent Hyg. 2013. PMID: 23986410 Review.
-
Consensus Conference Findings on Supragingival and Subgingival Air Polishing.Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017 Feb;38(2):e1-e4. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017. PMID: 28156118
Cited by
-
Professional biofilm management during supportive periodontal therapy-a longitudinal observational study.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):1277. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06642-7. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40739230 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Low-Particle-Size Toothpastes against Extrinsic Pigmentations: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;11(3):82. doi: 10.3390/dj11030082. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36975579 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lindhe J, Lang NK, Karring TK. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. Vol. 1. UK: Wiley; 2008.
-
- Bühler J, Amato M, Weiger R, Walter C. A systematic review on the effects of air polishing devices on oral tissues. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016;14:15–28. - PubMed
-
- Petersilka GJ. Subgingival air-polishing in the treatment of periodontal biofilm infections. Periodontol 2000. 2011;55:124–42. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources