Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Dec;31(12):8937-8946.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07942-6. Epub 2021 May 26.

Evaluation of the image quality and dose reduction in digital radiography with an advanced spatial noise reduction algorithm in pediatric patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of the image quality and dose reduction in digital radiography with an advanced spatial noise reduction algorithm in pediatric patients

Saelin Oh et al. Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether the advanced spatial noise reduction (ASNR) algorithm installed in a digital radiography system generates acceptable images at a lower dose than a conventional denoising algorithm in pediatric patients.

Methods: Nine sets of 30 images of pediatric patients, classified under three protocols and three age groups, were retrospectively selected. Different levels of low-dose image sets of these 270 images were generated by a noise simulation tool after validation testing using phantoms. Each image set was obtained with both the ASNR and conventional algorithm, and grouped randomly and blinded. Three experienced pediatric radiologists were asked to pick the "image with optimum dose" among images of different dose levels with an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) perspective. Dose reduction rates for each protocol and age group were calculated, and entrance skin exposure (ESE) was calculated using the values of kVp and mAs, assuming a standard body depth for each age group.

Results: With the ASNR algorithm, estimated dose reduction rates were highest for abdominal radiographs (45.0%, 27.3%, and 24.3% in infants, children, and adolescents, respectively, p < 0.001). The mean dose reductions for all age groups in the abdominal, chest, and skull radiographs were 32.8%, 12.9%, and 23.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). Average of the calculated ESE was lower with the ASNR algorithm than with the conventional algorithm group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The ASNR algorithm facilitated optimization of image quality with a higher reduction in radiation dose than the conventional algorithm, making it more acceptable for use in pediatric patients.

Key points: •ASNR algorithm in DR system improves image quality via enhanced contrast and noise removal by estimating actual noise distribution based on a multi-scale noise covariance and frequency processing. •Noise simulation tool (NST) generating images of different dose levels can be used for evaluation of the optimum dose without unnecessary additional radiation exposure to pediatric patients. •Retrospective clinical study using NST showed that the ASNR algorithm enabled a higher reduction in radiation dose than the conventional algorithm in pediatric patients.

Keywords: Algorithm; Digital radiography; Dose reduction; Pediatric patients; Phantoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Food and Drug Administration (2017) Pediatric information for x-ray imaging device premarket notifications. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville Available via https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents... . Accessed 6 Mar 2019
    1. Martin L, Ruddlesden R, Makepeace C, Robinson L, Mistry T, Starritt H (2013) Paediatric x-ray radiation dose reduction and image quality analysis. J Radiol Prot 33:621–633 - DOI
    1. Honey ID, Mackenzie A, Evans DS (2005) Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography. Br J Radiol 78:422–427 - DOI
    1. Tingberg A, Sjostrom D (2005) Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114:286–293 - DOI
    1. Rapp-Bernhardt U, Bernhardt TM, Lenzen H et al (2005) Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom. Radiology 237:485–491 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources