Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;55(5):1036-1044.
doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00303-x. Epub 2021 May 26.

Oncology Products in the European Union: An Analysis of Regulatory Approvals with a CHMP Oral Explanation

Affiliations

Oncology Products in the European Union: An Analysis of Regulatory Approvals with a CHMP Oral Explanation

Alexandra Oger et al. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The oral explanation (OE) is a critical event during new marketing authorisation procedures in the European Union (EU). The primary objective of the present study was to investigate how many procedures, having an OE in front of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), resulted in a regulatory approval for oncology products.

Methods: Procedures for new marketing authorisation applications (MAAs) and Type II variations (new indication) for oncology products with at least one OE (with or without a Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) meeting) and for which the outcome took place between 31 January 2016 to 31 January 2020 were included in the analysis. Publicly available agendas/meeting minutes and assessment reports were used to obtain information on the products.

Results: An OE occurred in about 20% of procedures (n = 28/150) for oncology products during the review period. The majority of procedures having an OE (61%), with or without any SAG meeting, led to MAA/Type II variation approval in the Centralised Procedure. It was also observed that in 41% of the cases a successful outcome was contingent upon willingness of the applicant to restrict the indication.

Conclusion: A majority of oncology procedures that had an OE resulted in a positive outcome suggesting that such agency interaction is an important opportunity for the applicant to have a last chance to resolve any outstanding issues at the final stage of the procedure.

Keywords: CHMP; Drug approval; Oncology; Oral explanation; Scientific Advisory Group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Guidance to applicants/marketing authorisation holders on oral explanations at EMA. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/regulatory-procedural-guideline/g...
    1. European Medicines Agency pre-authorisation procedural advice for users of the centralised procedure. https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/regulatory-procedural-guideline/euro...
    1. European Medicines Agency post-authorisation procedural advice for users of the centralised procedure. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/regulatory-procedural-guideline/e...
    1. Procedural Advice for CHMP on the need to convene a Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) or Ad Hoc Expert Meeting. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/procedural-advice-committee...
    1. European Medicines Agency website. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines

LinkOut - more resources