Opioid medicines management in primary care settings: A scoping review of quantitative studies of pharmacist activities
- PMID: 34041786
- DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14915
Opioid medicines management in primary care settings: A scoping review of quantitative studies of pharmacist activities
Abstract
To undertake a scoping review of pharmacist activities in opioid medicines management in primary care settings, including those developed or led by pharmacists, or in which pharmacists were members of broader multidisciplinary teams, and to collate the activities, models of care and settings, and reported outcomes. The bibliographic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, CINAHL, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched. Studies with quantitative evaluation and published in English were eligible. Participants were patients with any pain category or an opioid use disorder, and healthcare providers. Studies originating in hospitals or involving supply functions were not included. Screening of literature and data charting of results were undertaken by two researchers. The 51 studies included in the scoping review occurred in primary care settings collated into four categories: general practice or primary care clinics, healthcare organisations, community pharmacies and outreach services. Studies were primarily of opioid use in chronic, noncancer pain. Other indications were opioid use disorder, cancer and dental pain. Pharmacist activities targeted risk mitigation, patient and provider education and broader, strategic approaches. Patient-related outcomes included reduced opioid load, improved functionality and symptom management, enhanced access to services and medication-assisted treatments, and engagement in risk-mitigation strategies. Behaviour change of providers was demonstrated. The review has identified the significant contribution that pharmacists working in primary care settings can make to minimise harm from opioids. Strategies implemented in isolation have the potential to further reduce adverse clinical outcomes with greater collaboration and coordination, such as opioid stewardship.
Keywords: chronic noncancer pain; general practice; opioid; opioid agreement; opioid use disorder; pharmacist; stewardship; take-home naloxone.
© 2021 British Pharmacological Society.
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
The role of pharmacists in opioid stewardship: A scoping review.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 May;18(5):2714-2747. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jul 4. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022. PMID: 34261590
-
The role of pharmacists in opioid stewardship: Protocol.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 May;17(5):993-996. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.06.027. Epub 2020 Jul 3. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021. PMID: 33773640
-
Role of pharmacists in optimising opioid therapy for chronic non-malignant pain; A systematic review.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Mar;18(3):2352-2366. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 24. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022. PMID: 33309322
-
Patient and pharmacist perspectives on opioid misuse screening and brief interventions in community pharmacies.Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Apr 8;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00460-y. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024. PMID: 38589965 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Interprofessional Active Learning for Chronic Pain: Transforming Student Learning From Recall to Application.J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023 Dec 25;10:23821205231221950. doi: 10.1177/23821205231221950. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023. PMID: 38152832 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Managing medicines at the end of life: a position paper for health policy and practice.J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Nov 18;35(9):368-377. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2020-0440. J Health Organ Manag. 2021. PMID: 34841822 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Karanges EA, Blanch B, Buckley NA, Pearson SA. Twenty-five years of prescription opioid use in Australia: a whole-of-population analysis using pharmaceutical claims. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82(1):255-267.
-
- Sullivan MD, Howe CQ. Opioid therapy for chronic pain in the United States: promises and perils. Pain. 2013;154(Suppl 1):S94-S100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.009
-
- Daveluy A, Micallef J, Sanchez-Pena P, et al. Ten-year trend of opioid and nonopioid analgesic use in the French adult population. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;87(2):555-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14415
-
- Campbell G, Lintzeris N, Gisev N, Larance B, Pearson S, Degenhardt L. Regulatory and other responses to the pharmaceutical opioid problem. Med J Aust. Jan 2019;210(1):6-8e1. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.12047
-
- Mathieson S, Wertheimer G, Maher C, et al. What proportion of patients with chronic noncancer pain are prescribed an opioid medicine? Systematic review and meta-regression of observational studies. J Intern Med. 2020;287(5):458-474.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical